Cells. 2026 Jun 23. pii: 1134. [Epub ahead of print]15(13):
Autophagy-associated readouts in localized prostate cancer cannot be interpreted based on LC3, p62/SQSTM1, or LC3 puncta alone. In line with the concept of autophagy as a stress-response system, this review proposes a flux-aware, organelle-centered framework for assigning biological meaning to autophagy-related changes under disease-relevant stress. The framework integrates oxidative burden, lysosomal competence, selective autophagy, mitophagy, ferritinophagy, p62/SQSTM1-NRF2 signaling, ferroptosis-aware controls, and disease-stage context to distinguish four interpretive states: homeostatic quality control, adaptive tumor survival, blocked clearance, and stress-overload vulnerability. Flavonoid-associated responses are used as stress-test examples because they expose recurrent limitations in the field, including supraphysiologic exposures, limited metabolite realism, static-marker inflation, and insufficient assessment of lysosomal function. However, the framework is not restricted to dietary compounds; it applies to metabolic, pharmacological, inflammatory, androgen-related, radiation-associated, or therapy-induced perturbations in which autophagy-associated markers are altered without resolution of flux or organelle function. By linking autophagosome formation, cargo turnover, lysosomal acidification, redox buffering, and phenotype-level endpoints, this review defines a practical evidence hierarchy for interpreting autophagy in localized prostate cancer and for prioritizing translational vulnerabilities arising from organelle crosstalk. This contribution is primarily conceptual and is operationalized methodologically through flux-based evaluation criteria and translationally through disease-window-specific study-design recommendations.
Keywords: autophagic flux; autophagy; disease models; ferroptosis; localized prostate cancer; lysosomal competence; mitophagy; proteostasis; selective autophagy; stress response