bims-carter Biomed News
on CAR-T Therapies
Issue of 2026–10–25
fifty-four papers selected by
Luca Bolliger, lxBio



  1. Cancer Sci. 2026 Oct 18.
      Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has transformed the treatment of hematologic malignancies and established a new paradigm for engineered cellular immunotherapy. However, its broader clinical application remains constrained by complex autologous manufacturing, high cost, limited scalability, variable product quality, suboptimal efficacy in solid tumors, and treatment-related toxicities. To address these challenges, recent advances in CAR-T cell therapy can be viewed across four interconnected dimensions: functional engineering, manufacturing innovation, alternative cell sources, and in vivo CAR programming. Functional engineering includes cytokine-armored, checkpoint-resistant, multi-targeting, and modular or switchable CAR platforms designed to enhance efficacy, persistence, and safety. In parallel, manufacturing innovations such as shortened culture protocols, automated closed systems, and preservation of less differentiated T-cell states aim to improve product potency while reducing production time and complexity. Alternative cell sources, including allogeneic donor-derived and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived platforms, may further enable standardized, scalable, and potentially off-the-shelf therapies. Finally, in vivo CAR programming has emerged as a fourth dimension in which endogenous immune cells are directly engineered within patients using viral or non-viral gene delivery systems. This review summarizes these interconnected advances and discusses how they may collectively shape the next generation of CAR-based immune therapies.
    Keywords:  CAR‐T cell therapy; cytokine‐armored CAR‐T cells; in vivo CAR programming; manufacturing innovation
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.70567
  2. J Orthop Translat. 2026 Nov;61 101235
      Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has transformed hematologic oncology, but its application in orthopaedic diseases remains at an early stage. In bone malignancies, including osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and bone metastases, antigen heterogeneity, limited trafficking and persistence, and the immunosuppressive skeletal microenvironment restrict efficacy. CAR-engineered approaches are also emerging in non-malignant disorders: CD19-directed CAR-T therapy has shown early clinical activity in refractory rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune rheumatic diseases, whereas senolytic CAR-T strategies for osteoarthritis remain preclinical. This review summarizes current evidence across malignant and non-malignant orthopaedic conditions, with emphasis on target selection, safety, and translational feasibility. Key barriers include antigen escape, impaired infiltration, limited persistence, local immunosuppression, manufacturing complexity, and on-target/off-tumour toxicity. Emerging strategies include multi-target receptors, chemokine receptor engineering, locoregional delivery, safety-control systems, and allogeneic or point-of-care manufacturing. Current evidence supports CAR-T and related CAR-engineered cells as potential complementary approaches for selected refractory orthopaedic conditions, although further translation requires stronger clinical evidence and improved biological and manufacturing strategies. The Translational Potential of this Article: This review identifies disease-specific targets, barriers, and engineering priorities relevant to translating CAR-engineered cell therapies into orthopaedic practice. These considerations may inform preclinical validation and early-phase trials in refractory bone malignancies and selected non-malignant musculoskeletal disorders.
    Keywords:  Autoimmune rheumatic diseases; Bone malignancies; Bone metastases; CAR T-cell therapy; Osteoarthritis; Tumour microenvironment
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2026.101235
  3. Cureus. 2026 Sep;18(9): e116377
      Autoimmune diseases are chronic immune-mediated disorders that, in their systemic forms, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis (SSc), idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV), remain associated with progressive organ damage, impaired quality of life, and excess mortality despite conventional immunosuppression. A substantial proportion of patients experience refractory disease, recurrent flares, and glucocorticoid dependence, underscoring the need for therapies that address the underlying disease process rather than merely suppressing symptoms. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, originally developed for B-cell malignancies, has emerged as a potential paradigm shift by achieving deep, tissue-level B-cell depletion followed by immune reconstitution, a process often described as an "immune reset." This narrative review summarizes the immunological rationale, clinical evidence, safety profile, and future directions of B-cell-directed (anti-CD19) CAR-T therapy in autoimmune disease. Current evidence identifies refractory SLE as the most mature indication, with reproducible drug-free remission, seroconversion, and durable responses across independent cohorts. Early studies in inflammatory myopathies and SSc report encouraging responses and reduced immunosuppressive requirements, whereas evidence in AAV remains preclinical. Toxicities such as cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity appear less frequent and less severe than in oncology, although infections and hypogammaglobulinemia require monitoring. High cost, complex manufacturing, and limited long-term data remain major barriers, while allogeneic CAR-natural killer cells and in vivo engineering may improve scalability. Larger controlled studies with longer follow-up are needed before routine clinical use.
    Keywords:  allogeneic car-nk cells; autoimmune diseases; b-cell depletion; car-t cell therapy; immune reset; systemic lupus erythematosus
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.116377
  4. Genes Dis. 2027 Feb;14(2): 102245
      Autoimmune diseases are a clinical challenge because current immunosuppressive therapies fail to eliminate pathogenic immunocytes, such as autoreactive B cells, plasma cells, and antigen-presenting cells, which induce chronic inflammation. Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy offers a targeted strategy to eliminate these disease-driving populations. Early ex vivo CAR-T cell studies on severe autoimmunity have shown effective B-cell depletion and sustained remission. However, its toxicity, cost, and lengthy manufacturing process limit its widespread clinical use. In vivo CAR-T technologies-using viral vectors or mRNA lipid nanoparticles to generate CAR-T cells directly within the patient-aim to overcome these barriers. Preclinical and emerging clinical data indicate that these platforms can rapidly reprogram circulating T cells, induce potent B-cell clearance, and achieve clinical improvement in refractory diseases. Viral vectors provide durable expression but raise integration and immunogenicity concerns, whereas mRNA-LNP systems enable transient, controllable CAR expression with greater manufacturing scalability. These advances have positioned in vivo CAR-T cells as a promising therapeutic strategy for autoimmune diseases. Continuing progress in delivery specificity, safety engineering, trial design, and cost-effective production is essential for translating this approach into widely accessible treatments. In this review, we synthesized preclinical and emerging clinical evidence, compared delivery platforms, and proposed practical recommendations for safety engineering, trial design, and manufacturing, which will help guide future translational efforts and accelerate clinical adoption.
    Keywords:  Autoimmune diseases; Immunotherapy; In vivo CAR-T; Viral vectors; mRNA-LNP
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gendis.2026.102245
  5. Drug Discov Today. 2026 Oct 20. pii: S1359-6446(26)00244-8. [Epub ahead of print] 104839
      Cell (including tissue) and gene therapies (CGTs) have the potential to address unmet medical needs, yet few have successfully navigated the medicine lifecycle toward patient access in Europe because of impeding factors with possibly different stakeholder perspectives. Through a scoping review, we identified 991 document-stakeholder-theme combinations across 30 major themes of impeding factors and seven lifecycle categories. Most frequently reported themes were legislation & regulatory framework and capacity, resources, expertise, followed by uncertainty in regulatory & reimbursement assessments, quality requirements, and collaboration & coordination. Several stakeholders and product types were under-represented. We recommend active multistakeholder collaboration in designing legislation and capacity building to sustain patient access.
    Keywords:  ATMPs; Europe; advanced therapy medicinal products; cell therapy; gene therapy; medicine lifecycle; patient access; regulation; reimbursement; tissue engineering
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2026.104839
  6. Front Immunol. 2026 ;17 1977867
      The presence of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) in the tumor microenvironment is associated with lower survival rates for cancer patients. Presumably due to the immunosuppressive activity of neutrophils (also known as Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell (MDSC) activity). We investigated whether this MDSC activity shows any selectivity in suppressing specific lymphocyte subsets. Our data show that CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, both naive and memory fractions, are sensitive to PMN-MDSC activity. Similarly, regulatory T cells, believed to play an important immunosuppressive function themselves, were affected too. In contrast, the more innate-like γδ T cells and Natural Killer (NK) cells were left intact. Our data suggest that Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-NK and γδ CAR-T cell immunotherapy may be less susceptible to PMN-MDSC activity. Therefore, using such MDSC-resistant innate cells as cellular products may be of advantage over the common αβ CAR-T cell therapies. Additionally, further deciphering the exact mechanisms by which neutrophils suppress αβ T cells could lead to improved T cell immunotherapies.
    Keywords:  MDSC activity; NK cells; T cell subsets; immunotherapy; neutrophils
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1977867
  7. J Mater Chem B. 2026 Oct 20.
      Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is less effective in solid tumors than in selected hematologic malignancies because vascular, stromal, spatial, and immunosuppressive barriers restrict cell delivery and function. Local hydrogels and related biomaterials can convert a transient administration into a spatially organized depot, but their benefit depends on more than polymer identity. This review therefore combines a scenario-driven framework-depot versus bolus, intratumoral versus peritumoral placement, unresected versus postsurgical disease, and cell-loaded versus cell-free support-with a materials-centered analysis of formation, administration, time-dependent mechanics, architecture, degradation, biochemical presentation, and manufacturing. Direct evidence is distinguished from adjacent mechanistic evidence and design hypotheses. Across the available studies, the best-supported functions are improved delivered-cell recovery, regional persistence, controlled presentation of supportive cues, and enhanced antitumor activity in selected preclinical models. By contrast, universal material-property optima, clinically validated hydrogel-CAR-T products, and cryopreservation of a final cell-loaded depot have not been established. We define practical tests for gelation and device compatibility, productive egression, material-to-cell fitness, component attribution, and integrated-product safety. A materials-focused comparative table and a 30-study evidence map separate measured values from inferred mechanisms and identify where CAR-T cells were directly loaded, administered separately, manufactured in a matrix, or generated in situ. The resulting framework emphasizes that successful platforms must coordinate material behavior, CAR-T quality, anatomical placement, and clinical workflow rather than maximizing retention or chemical complexity alone.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1039/d6tb01815g
  8. Front Immunol. 2026 ;17 1909384
      Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has achieved remarkable remission rates exceeding 80% in relapsed/refractory pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), yet 40-50% of patients eventually relapse within the first year. This therapeutic ceiling is not a single failure mode but the convergence of at least four interrelated layers: loss of CAR-T persistence, antigen escape driven by CD19 splicing variants and lineage switch, CAR-T cell-intrinsic exhaustion from chronic tonic signaling, and an immunosuppressive bone marrow microenvironment that actively extinguishes effector function. Our systematic analysis of 226 pediatric-eligible CAR-T trials shows that 95.6% are Phase I-II, 3.5% (8/226) are registered as Phase III/IV, and 58 of 102 completed trials (56.9%) had no outcome recorded in the source database. In this Perspective, we synthesize the molecular mechanisms of CAR-T resistance, contextualize them within the current clinical trial landscape, and critically evaluate emerging engineering strategies-from dual-targeting and armored CAR architectures to CRISPR-edited allogeneic products and in vivo mRNA delivery. We argue that progress depends on both smarter receptor design and structural reforms in trial design, outcome transparency and global collaboration.
    Keywords:  CAR-T cell therapy; allogeneic CAR-T; antigen escape; chimeric antigen receptor; immunotherapy resistance; pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia; translational bottleneck
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1909384
  9. iScience. 2026 Nov 20. 29(11): 117255
      Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has transformed outcomes in selected hematologic malignancies, yet its delivery remains constrained by variable efficacy, acute and prolonged toxicities, and complex manufacturing logistics. Artificial intelligence (AI) is being applied across the CAR-T continuum at three distinct levels of evidentiary maturity. Externally validated parsimonious models built on routine clinical and laboratory data including CAR-HEMATOTOX, endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) and m-EASIX, MyCARe, and gradient-boosting cytokine release syndrome predictors provide deployable risk stratification today. Methodologically sophisticated tools using deep-learning positron emission tomography (PET) segmentation, attention-based digital-pathology analysis, and multimodal fusion of imaging with laboratory and circulating tumor DNA features have demonstrated technical promise but generally lack the multi-center external validation required for clinical-grade deployment. Forward-looking applications, including digital-twin frameworks, large language models, and closed-loop adaptive therapy, remain at the prototype stage and have not yet been validated for CAR-T. This review synthesizes these three tiers, summarizes 18 published AI and statistical-modeling tools in a comparative performance table, and compares data characteristics and AI modeling paradigms across large B cell lymphoma, B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and multiple myeloma. We also identify the implementation realities-absent regulatory clearance, demographic and racial bias in training data, and post-deployment model drift-that condition the field's evolution. The contribution of AI to CAR-T therapy, as the evidence currently stands, is the calibrated quantification of established risk factors rather than the discovery of novel biology, but the methodological and data infrastructure foundations are now in place for the broader transformation that the next decade may enable.
    Keywords:  CAR-T therapy; artificial intelligence; cytokine modeling; digital pathology; digital twins; radiomics
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.117255
  10. Front Immunol. 2026 ;17 1963794
      Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has transformed the treatment of hematological malignancies, yet its efficacy in solid tumors remains limited by inefficient trafficking, suppressive myeloid and regulatory T-cell populations, and metabolic stress. These barriers contribute to incomplete tumor cell killing and loss of CAR-T cell function. Chemokines are usually viewed as migratory guides, but in solid tumors they also orchestrate immune cell positioning and inflammatory state. In this review, we discuss how chemokine gradients form inflammatory niches and control CAR-T-cell recruitment, intratumoral distribution, retention, and egress. We also examine how chemokine programs interact with cytokine signaling and regulated tumor cell death to shape local and potentially tissue-wide antitumor immunity, including through the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). Finally, we outline translational strategies that include engineered chemokines and matched chemokine receptor programs to enhance the efficacy of chemokine/cytokine-armored CAR-T cells, and related combination therapies.
    Keywords:  CAR-T cells; chemokines; functional chemokine gradients; immune resistance; immunogenic cell death; solid tumors; tumor microenvironment
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1963794
  11. Front Immunol. 2026 ;17 1920627
      γδ T cells are a unique lymphocyte lineage that bridges innate and adaptive immunity through MHC-unrestricted recognition of phosphoantigens, lipids, and stress-induced proteins. Their tissue-resident subsets, shaped by Vγ/Vδ chain usage, play essential roles in barrier surveillance, tissue homeostasis, and host defense.This review synthesizes recent advances that fundamentally reshape our understanding of γδ T cell biology. We highlight two conceptual frameworks: (1) dual recognition modalities of γδ TCRs, distinguishing structurally resolved ligand interactions from functionally supported recognition; and (2) a developmental wave model in which TCR signal strength and transcriptional networks program effector fates. Mouse and human studies are presented in dedicated species-specific sections and tables, with explicit attention to species-specific nomenclature and evidence levels.We cover γδ T cell development, tissue-resident programs, antigen recognition mechanisms (including butyrophilin-mediated phosphoantigen sensing, antibody-like foreign antigen recognition, and intracellular self-protein recognition), and the dual roles of γδ T cells in infection, cancer, and chronic inflammation. Therapeutic applications-adoptive transfer, CAR-engineered cells, and extracellular-vesicle vaccines-are critically appraised against current clinical evidence.Finally, we identify major unanswered questions: the complete γδ TCR ligand repertoire, the mechanisms maintaining tissue residency, and the translational gaps between mouse models and human disease. This review provides a structured framework for understanding γδ T cells as pivotal connectors of innate and adaptive immunity.
    Keywords:  immunotherapy; innate-like lymphocytes; tissue-resident T cells; γδ T cells; γδ TCR complex
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1920627
  12. Front Immunol. 2026 ;17 1976202
      Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered natural killer (NK) cells represent a promising platform for cancer immunotherapy; however, optimization of CAR architecture and additional engineering strategies remain necessary to improve their functional activity. In this study, we generated CD19/BCMA dual-target CAR constructs based on tandem and bicistronic configurations with or without membrane-bound interleukin-15 (mbIL-15), and further evaluated engineered virus-like particle (eVLP)-mediated CREM editing as an additional strategy for CAR-NK cell engineering. Four CAR configurations were evaluated in primary human T and NK cells for CAR expression, cytotoxicity, cytokine production, and proliferative activity. Bicistronic CD19/BCMA CAR-mbIL-15 cells exhibited enhanced functional activity compared with corresponding tandem CAR-mbIL-15 cells, including increased tumor-cell killing and activation-associated functional responses in vitro. In a CD19/BCMA-positive leukemia xenograft model, bicistronic CD19/BCMA CAR-mbIL-15 T and NK cells reduced tumor burden, delayed disease progression, and prolonged survival. Furthermore, eVLP-mediated CREM editing achieved efficient genome modification in primary NK cells and remained compatible with subsequent CAR engineering. CREM-edited CAR-NK cells exhibited increased cytotoxic activity compared with unedited CAR-NK cells in vitro. Collectively, these findings support the development of modular CAR-NK engineering strategies integrating CAR architecture optimization, membrane-bound cytokine armoring, and transient genome engineering.
    Keywords:  CAR-NK cells; CAR-T cells; CD19/BCMA dual targeting; CREM editing; IL-15 armoring; cancer immunotherapy; engineered virus-like particles; genome editing
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1976202
  13. iScience. 2026 Oct 16. 29(10): 117390
      Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy provides substantial clinical benefits in hematologic malignancies. However, cell engineering using conventional viral vectors is costly, labor intensive, and prone to safety risks, while electroporation-induced cellular damage limits manufacturing scalability. This study reports a safe, high-efficiency, nonviral platform for generating mRNA-engineered CAR T cells. Herein, eight ionizable lipids are synthesized and formulated into lipid nanoparticles. Systematic screening and structural optimization identified lipid 6 as the lead candidate. Transfection efficiency is validated by delivering enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) mRNA into DC2.4, peripheral blood mononuclear, dendritic, and natural killer cells. Murine models confirm robust in vivo expression and a favorable safety profile. Lipid 6-mediated delivery of MUC1 mRNA generates MUC1-CAR T cells characterized by high surface receptor expression and potent cytotoxicity against MUC1-positive tumor cells. These findings establish lipid 6 as a feasible strategy for primary human T cell engineering, facilitating functional CAR expression with minimal toxicity.
    Keywords:  cell engineering; chimeric antigen receptor T cells; immunotherapy; lipid nanoparticles; mRNA delivery
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.117390
  14. Neurol Ther. 2026 Oct 23.
      The therapeutic landscape of myasthenia gravis (MG) has changed substantially with advances in immunopathogenesis and the introduction of targeted, mechanism-based immunotherapies. For decades, treatment relied primarily on corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressive agents, which are effective but often limited by delayed onset, long-term toxicity, and incomplete disease control. This review summarizes current and emerging therapies for generalized MG, focusing on mechanisms of action, clinical efficacy, safety, and practical considerations, while also addressing real-world evidence, treatment switching and sequencing, and factors relevant to individualized decision-making. Complement-targeted therapies, including eculizumab, ravulizumab, zilucoplan, gefurulimab, and the emerging RNA interference-based agent cemdisiran, and neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibitors, including efgartigimod, rozanolixizumab, and nipocalimab, have substantially expanded therapeutic options. B cell-targeted therapies, particularly rituximab and inebilizumab, have also broadened the therapeutic landscape, especially for refractory disease and muscle-specific kinase antibody-positive MG. Emerging approaches, including chimeric antigen receptor T cell and chimeric autoantibody receptor T cell therapies, plasma cell-directed therapies, regulatory T cell-based therapies, and antigen-specific immune tolerance strategies, may further improve long-term disease control by targeting the underlying autoimmune process. Important unmet needs remain, including limited treatment accessibility, insufficient evidence for specific patient populations, and the lack of validated predictive biomarkers. In the absence of direct head-to-head trials or validated predictive biomarkers, individualized treatment selection should integrate autoantibody status, disease activity and urgency, clinical characteristics, prior treatment response and toxicity, comorbidities and safety considerations, treatment burden, reproductive considerations, patient preferences, and access. Future progress will depend on the development and validation of predictive biomarkers to enable biomarker-guided precision medicine, together with advances in targeted immunotherapy and immune tolerance-inducing strategies, with the ultimate goal of achieving durable remission and improving long-term outcomes and quality of life.
    Keywords:  Autoimmune neuromuscular disease; Complement inhibitor; Emerging therapies; FcRn inhibitor; Immune tolerance; Immunotherapy; Myasthenia gravis; Precision medicine
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-026-01066-z
  15. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2026 Oct 16. pii: szag084. [Epub ahead of print]15(11):
      Despite innovative progress, cellular therapies have not produced durable, population-level survival gains in glioblastoma. Across 3 major modalities, engineered effectors such as chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) and natural killer (NK) cells, immune-education platforms such as dendritic and whole-cell vaccines, and carrier cells delivering oncolytic or drug payloads, trials have shown measurable bioactivity, but durability has varied. This likely reflects systemic barriers, including therapy-induced lymphopenia, myeloid dominance, and T-cell sequestration, as well as local barriers such as antigen heterogeneity and immune suppression. To understand why some studies nevertheless showed more favorable efficacy signals, we reviewed clinical outcomes across these modalities and identified 4 recurring design features that appeared repeatedly among studies reporting more favorable survival signals: treatment in the minimal residual disease setting, a T-helper type 1 supportive context, broadened antigenic coverage, and effective immune hand-off from the initiating therapy to endogenous or adoptively transferred effectors. Across heterogeneous early-phase studies, greater feature alignment sometimes co-occurred with more favorable signals, although this retrospective pattern is descriptive and does not establish association or causality. These observations may help guide future biomarker-informed strategies and provide a practical framework for organizing multimodal trials aimed at converting transient bioactivity into more durable, polyclonal control.
    Keywords:  CAR-T cells; NK cells; cell therapy; clinical trials; glioblastoma; glioma; immunotherapy; myeloid immune cells; oncolytic virotherapy; stem cells
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1093/stcltm/szag084
  16. Curr Oncol Rep. 2026 Oct 21. pii: 106. [Epub ahead of print]28(1):
       PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review evaluates the evolving landscape of cardiovascular toxicities associated with two pillars of modern cancer treatment: immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. It examines their distinct immune-mediated pathophysiologies, clinical manifestations, and management frameworks.
    RECENT FINDINGS: While ICIs carry a clinical trial incidence for cardiotoxicity of approximately 1%, real-world data suggest rates of 3-5%, with myocarditis sometimes manifesting early as part of a high-mortality "Triple M" or overlap syndrome. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occur in nearly 50% of ICI-myocarditis cases. Diagnosis relies on clinical presentation, biomarkers and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) using the modified Lake Louise criteria, with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) detection sensitivity increasing from 21.6% to 72.0% when imaged after four days of symptoms. Conversely, CAR-T cardiotoxicity is predominantly driven by cytokine release syndrome (CRS), which affects 49-93% of patients with currently licensed products. Severe CRS more than doubles the risk of cardiovascular events, including a 6-10% incidence of LVEF decline and a 4-18% incidence of arrhythmias. Recent advancements include machine learning models to predict MACE and structured screening programs to risk-stratify candidates. Cardiotoxicity remains a significant complication, highlighting the need for vigilant monitoring and early intervention. Management relies on baseline risk assessment and rapid deployment of targeted therapies, such as high-dose methylprednisolone for ICI-myocarditis and IL-6 inhibition (tocilizumab) for CAR-T-related CRS. A multidisciplinary cardio-oncology approach is essential to mitigate risks. With early diagnosis and appropriate immunosuppressive strategies in a multidisciplinary setting, these complications can be better managed, optimising oncological benefits whilst reducing treatment-related morbidity and mortality in majority of patients.
    Keywords:  Cancer; CardioOncology; Cardiotoxicity; Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T); Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-026-01850-y
  17. Front Immunol. 2026 ;17 1861621
      Ex vivo expansion is a fundamental yet challenging step in the manufacturing of adoptive cell therapies (ACT), as therapeutic success relies on generating enough functional immune cells while maintaining their phenotype, metabolic fitness, and persistence. This review provides a comprehensive overview of immunomodulatory strategies designed to enhance cell yield during ex vivo expansion, categorizing them into cell-intrinsic and cell-extrinsic approaches. Cell-intrinsic strategies, including gene editing and gene transfer technologies, enable precise modulation of survival pathways, proliferation, metabolic state, and resistance to exhaustion. These tools support the production of more potent and durable immune cell products. In contrast, cell-extrinsic strategies shape immune cell behavior through cytokine supplementation, checkpoint blockade, nutrient and metabolic modulation, feeder cell systems, synthetic activation platforms, and biophysical cues such as oxygen tension and bioreactor-controlled environments. Together, these strategies provide coordinated signals that direct activation, differentiation, and persistence during expansion in culture. The review also highlights key regulatory considerations, including distinctions between genetically and non-genetically modified products, risk assessments associated with human and animal-derived materials, ancillary material qualification, and process scalability for clinical translation. By integrating biological, engineering, and regulatory perspectives, this paper outlines principles for scalable immunomodulation platforms designed with regulatory considerations in mind to advance next-generation ACT manufacturing.
    Keywords:  CAR-T cell manufacturing; NK cell manufacturing; adoptive cell therapy (ACT); ex vivo expansion; immunomodulation; regulatory frameworks
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1861621
  18. Oncogenesis. 2026 Jul 25. pii: 54. [Epub ahead of print]15(1):
      Evasion of apoptosis is a central hallmark of cancer and a major driver of therapeutic resistance. While genomic and transcriptomic profiling have reshaped our understanding of cancer, they often fail to predict whether a cell will die when treated. BH3 profiling and its variants solve this by directly interrogating mitochondrial apoptotic priming and its reliance on anti-apoptotic dependencies by directly exposing cells to defined BH3-only peptides. Over the past decade, researchers have successfully applied these assays across a wide range of hematologic malignancies, solid tumors, and resistant cancer models. This functional assay predicts treatment response, identifies rational drug combinations, and reveals mechanisms of both intrinsic and acquired resistance to apoptosis. In hematologic malignancies, functional dependence on BCL-2 measured by BH3 profiling strongly correlates with sensitivity to venetoclax, while reduced mitochondrial priming underlies resistance. In solid tumors, these analyses have uncovered previously unappreciated reliance on BCL-xL and MCL-1, enabling the design of effective combination strategies despite limited single-agent activity of BH3 mimetics. Recent methodological advances, including high-throughput and dynamic BH3 profiling, further highlight the changing and heterogeneous nature of apoptotic regulation within tumors. This review evaluates the preclinical and early clinical evidence for BH3 profiling in precision oncology. Beyond assessing its current performance, we examine the methodological requirements for its transition into clinical settings and its potential to address the limitations of current personalized cancer therapies.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41389-026-00647-9
  19. Mater Today Bio. 2026 Dec;41 103737
      Immune cell engagers (ICEs) are emerging therapeutic platforms that redirect immune effector cells toward cancer cells by physically bridging immune-cell receptors with tumor-associated targets. This cell-bridging mechanism converts molecular recognition into localized immune activation, immune synapse formation, cytotoxic killing, or phagocytic clearance. Such contact-centered immune redirection complements immune checkpoint blockade, which can restore antitumor immunity but does not directly promote the physical immune cell-tumor cell contact required for productive effector functions. Building on this principle, advances in molecular and biomaterial engineering have expanded ICE design beyond conventional molecular formats, enabling programmable molecular bridges, engineered living cell surfaces, and material-scaffolded systems that coordinate tumor targeting, immune-cell recruitment, and functional modulation. In this review, we organized these approaches according to three levels of ICE engineering: (1) molecular ICEs such as engineered antibodies and aptamers, (2) living cell engagers based on cell surface engineering using molecular constructs or biomaterials and (3) nanoparticle platforms. Across these platforms, we discuss molecular architecture, tumor-targeting specificity, immune cell recruitment, and functional modulation as key factors governing direct immune-tumor cell interactions. By connecting diverse strategies through a common cell-engagement perspective, this review highlights how these approaches can provide functional and spatial advantages for next-generation cancer immunotherapy.
    Keywords:  Biomaterials; Cancer immunotherapy; Immune cell engager; Immune modulation; Immune synapse
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2026.103737
  20. Cell. 2026 Oct 22. pii: S0092-8674(26)01202-X. [Epub ahead of print]
      Immune checkpoint blockade has transformed cancer therapy, but immune-related adverse events (irAEs) remain a major, sometimes fatal, limitation, and the lack of robust preclinical models has hindered mechanistic insight. We present the lifestyle-induced susceptibility to irAEs (LISA) model, in which diet-driven metabolic and microbial alterations recreate human-like susceptibility to anti-PD-1 toxicity. LISA recapitulates multi-organ irAEs with immune infiltration and cytokine production, severity depending on sex, age, treatment modality, and immunotherapy response. Mechanistically, dysbiosis marked by Akkermansia muciniphila enrichment accompanies aberrant immune activation, driving regulatory T cell (Treg) fragility and CD8+ cytotoxic effector populations, both observed in patients with irColitis. Dietary reversal, metabolite supplementation, and blocking interferon (IFN)-γ production or signaling in Tregs restored Treg stability and resolved inflammation. Human-to-mouse fecal microbiome transfer interacts with recipient diet to shape susceptibility. Together, these findings identify dietary, microbial, and immune drivers of irAEs, which can be leveraged to improve immunotherapy responses while minimizing toxicity.
    Keywords:  Akkermansia muciniphila; CD8(+) Trms; IFN-γ signaling; Treg fragility; Tregs; immune checkpoint blockade; immune-related adverse events; microbiome
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2026.09.055
  21. iScience. 2026 Nov 20. 29(11): 117827
      Radiotherapy is increasingly combined with CAR T cell therapy in B cell lymphomas, but treatment outcome may depend on the irradiation modality. We evaluated minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) as a partner for CD19 CAR T cells in an orthotopic primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma model in immunodeficient rats. CAR T therapy prolonged survival compared with untreated controls. MBRT at 30 Gy followed by CAR T cells five days later produced the longest median survival among radiotherapy-containing regimens and improved outcome compared with conventional radiotherapy (CRT) based combinations. Histopathological findings were consistent with these survival differences. However, MBRT plus CAR T therapy did not significantly outperform CAR T monotherapy. These results indicate that MBRT provides a favorable, non-antagonistic radiotherapy context for CAR T therapy and suggest that radiation modality should be considered when designing combinations of radiotherapy with adoptive cellular therapies.
    Keywords:  CAR-T therapy; minibeam radiotherapy; primary central nervous system lymphoma
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.117827
  22. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2026 ;14 1917849
       Introduction: Cell expansion is one of the most critical steps in the development of CAR-T cell manufacturing processes because it directly influences cell yield and process performance. The systematic optimization of expansion parameters using primary human T cells is often limited by inter-donor variability, cost, and experimental complexity. So, it is necessary to study more homogeneous populations that allow to stablish standardized conditions in a controlled environment that were able to be used as standard. So, in this study, we developed a Jurkat CAR-CD19 cell-based platform as a reproducible model for optimizing the cell expansion bioprocess under controlled culture conditions.
    Methods: CAR-CD19-expressing Jurkat cells were pre-generated, molecularly characterized and subsequently used to evaluate key bioprocess variables, including glucose concentration, inoculum density, culture medium composition (RPMI + 10% FBS versus Nutri-T without serum), shaking speed, and different culture operating modes (batch, fed-batch, and semi-perfusion). Cell growth kinetics, metabolite consumption, metabolite production, and CAR expression were evaluated throughout the optimization process.
    Results: An intermediate glucose concentration supported cell expansion without additional benefit from higher glucose supplementation. Serum-free Nutri-T medium promoted higher viable cell densities than RPMI (used as control media) under the evaluated conditions. Among the operating modes evaluated, semi-perfusion achieved the highest viable cell density, maintaining high cell viability and a homogeneous CAR-positive cell population at the end of culture in Nutri-T media.
    Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that the Jurkat CAR-CD19 model provides a robust and reproducible experimental platform for optimizing cell expansion bioprocesses. While further validation in primary human CAR-T cells is required, this model allows for the systematic evaluation of culture variables, minimizing experimental variability and facilitating early-stage process development for adoptive cell therapies.
    Keywords:  Jurkat cell model; cell adoptive therapies; cell expansion; culture media; expansion optimization; modes of culture operation
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2026.1917849
  23. J Transl Med. 2026 Jul 22. pii: 1319. [Epub ahead of print]24(1):
       BACKGROUND: Claudin18.2 is a clinically validated target for gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. However, the antigen heterogeneity, low surface density, and issues related to scFv-associated conformational instability and tonic signaling may limit the durability and therapeutic window of Claudin18.2-directed CAR-T cell therapy. Therefore, improving the design of CAR-T cells targeting Claudin18.2 could enhance their effectiveness in treating these cancers.
    METHODS: We generated third-generation Claudin18.2 CAR-T cells using either a humanized camelid single-domain antibody (VHH) or a conventional scFv as the antigen-recognition module, maintaining an identical CAR backbone for both constructs. To evaluate their performance, we used a gastric cancer cell-line panel with graded Claudin18.2 expression and corresponding xenograft models. We assessed CAR-T cell activity by measuring antigen-dependent cytotoxicity, cytokine secretion (IFN-γ and TNF-α), and reactivity toward antigen-negative targets. In vivo, we examined tumor control, T-cell infiltration, and CD8⁺ T-cell enrichment, and assessed toxicity. Additionally, we investigated the stability of CAR expression, T-cell expansion, and exhaustion-associated phenotypes. Structural modeling and molecular dynamics simulations were performed to evaluate the stability of the binding interface of the VHH-Claudin18.2 complex relative to the scFv-Claudin18.2 complex.
    RESULTS: VHH-based CAR-T cells exhibited superior antigen-dependent activity compared to scFv-based CAR-T cells. VHH-CAR-T cells maintained higher cytotoxicity and IFN-γ and TNF-α secretion even under low antigen density and displayed minimal reactivity against antigen-negative targets. In vivo, VHH-CAR-T cells achieved faster and more durable tumor control, with enhanced intratumoral T-cell infiltration and CD8⁺ T-cell enrichment, without any overt toxicity. Mechanistically, the use of a VHH recognition domain was associated with better preserved surface CAR expression after antigen engagement, expanded more robustly, displayed fewer exhaustion-associated phenotypes, had a higher proportion of central memory T cells, and showed transcriptional enrichment of proliferative and effector programs with restrained exhaustion signatures. Structural modeling and molecular dynamics simulations further confirmed that the VHH-Claudin18.2 binding interface was more stable than that of scFv-Claudin18.2.
    CONCLUSION: Replacing scFv with VHH is associated with enhanced functional performance, persistence, and therapeutic efficacy of Claudin18.2-directed CAR-T. These findings support the further development and translation of VHH-based CAR-T strategies for solid tumor treatment.
    Keywords:  CAR-T; Claudin18.2; Gastric cancer; Nanobody; VHH; scFv
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-026-08611-2
  24. Int J Nanomedicine. 2026 ;21 639887
      Adoptive antitumor immunity ultimately fails because metabolically hostile tumor microenvironments (TME) drive T cells into a dysfunctional exhausted state that current checkpoint blockade only partially reverses. Crucially, the principal metabolic stresses - accumulation of lactate, lipids and adenosine, deprivation of glucose and amino acids, and hypoxia - do not act in isolation but form a densely cross-regulated network that progressively reinforces T cell exhaustion. This review synthesizes how each barrier arises and how they amplify one another, then maps nanomaterial-based countermeasures onto this network: catalytic nanomaterials that degrade lactate and adenosine, lipid-modulating and mitochondria-targeted formulations, amino-acid replenishment systems, and hypoxia-relieving designs that pair metabolic correction with checkpoint inhibition or photodynamic therapy. Particular attention is given to the design principles - tissue targeting, stimuli-responsive release and rational combination - that determine whether metabolic reprogramming yields durable restoration of T cell function rather than transient phenotypic rescue. Emerging preclinical evidence indicates that nanomaterial-mediated metabolic remodeling can convert the immunosuppressive TME into an immune-supportive niche and recover effector function of exhausted T cells. We further identify the key gaps that currently limit clinical translation: the absence of subset-level evaluation distinguishing reversible progenitor-like exhausted T cells from terminally exhausted cells, the lack of epigenetic endpoints such as histone lactylation, off-target metabolic suppression of T cells themselves, and the manufacturing and safety hurdles of clinical-grade nanomaterials. Resolving these issues would establish metabolic reprogramming as a credible frontier for next-generation cancer immunotherapy.
    Keywords:  T cell exhaustion; TME; metabolic reprogramming; nanomaterials; tumor microenvironment
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S639887
  25. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2026 Jan-Dec;25:25 15330338261499846
      
    Keywords:  CAR T-cells; cellular immunotherapy; claudin 18.2; gastric cancer; gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma; pancreatic cancer; satricabtagene autoleucel
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338261499846
  26. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2026 Oct 21.
      Advances in analytical and manufacturing sciences are reshaping biosimilar evidence requirements. These developments support evidence-proportionate regulatory frameworks that place greater weight on analytical and pharmacokinetic (PK) and/or pharmacodynamic (PD) evidence. A comparative efficacy study (CES) should be conducted only when it can feasibly address a specific residual uncertainty that is material to the regulatory decision and cannot be adequately resolved through comparative analytical, functional, PK and/or PD evidence. Japan's recent biosimilar reforms, including the flexible use of clinical data generated in non-Japanese subjects and clarification of the role of CES, provide a timely example of this transition. These reforms should not be misread as deregulation; rather, they are better understood as regulatory maturation. They illustrate how accumulated regulatory experience and advances in analytical science can be translated into science-based regulatory adaptation. A useful regulatory question is not whether a CES can occasionally provide information, but whether it is expected to change regulatory decision-making for a given product. Such adaptation may improve development efficiency, support patient access and contribute to health-system sustainability while maintaining regulatory rigour. The central challenge for the next phase of biosimilar regulation is not simply whether CES can be waived, but how evidence requirements should be recalibrated as analytical, manufacturing, and digital sciences continue to advance.
    Keywords:  Analytical advances; Analytical comparability; Biosimilars; Comparative efficacy studies; Evidence-proportionate regulation
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-026-01065-0
  27. J Hematol Oncol. 2026 Oct 21. pii: 91. [Epub ahead of print]19(1):
      Breast cancer develops within spatially organized, multicellular microenvironments in which particular tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) states can influence immune access and stromal remodeling. Conventional M1/M2 classification and total macrophage density fail to capture the developmental, transcriptional, metabolic, and spatial heterogeneity that determines TAM function. This macrophage-focused review examines breast cancer within its multicellular microenvironment, integrating lineage-tracing, single-cell, spatial, mechanistic, and clinical evidence while distinguishing breast-specific findings from hypotheses extrapolated from other tumors. We examine how tissue-resident and monocyte-derived macrophages are recruited, retained, expanded, and reprogrammed across primary and metastatic sites, emphasizing interactions with malignant cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts, extracellular matrix, vasculature, adipose tissue, and lymphoid populations. In defined breast-tumor contexts, TAM programs have been implicated in immune exclusion, invasion, metastatic dissemination, and adaptation to systemic treatment, although evidence strength varies across mechanisms and therapeutic modalities. Small and heterogeneous clinical studies have not established a benefit from broad CSF1/CSF1R-axis targeting in breast cancer, despite encouraging preclinical findings. Accordingly, we highlight a shift toward state-selective, spatially resolved, and temporally coordinated targeting. Emerging approaches include restoring phagocytosis, disrupting chemokine and fibrotic circuits, metabolic reprogramming, and converting suppressive TAMs into inflammatory, antigen-presenting effectors. A major focus is chimeric antigen receptor macrophage (CAR-M) therapy, which combines antigen-directed phagocytosis with tumor infiltration, matrix remodeling, antigen presentation, and recruitment of endogenous immunity. Although early clinical data support manufacturing feasibility, tumor trafficking, and acceptable initial safety, limited antitumor activity underscores challenges involving antigen heterogeneity, persistence, metabolic fitness, biodistribution, and scalable production. We propose a translational roadmap integrating spatial biomarkers, quantitative target selection, macrophage-adapted CAR design, checkpoint-resistant phagocytosis, metabolic engineering, safety switches, and biomarker-guided combination therapy. This framework positions macrophage reprogramming as a context-dependent strategy for modifying selected breast-tumor niches, with therapeutic targets chosen according to the macrophage program and its surrounding cellular architecture.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-026-01861-z
  28. Neoplasia. 2026 Oct 17. pii: S1476-5586(26)00115-6. [Epub ahead of print]82 101383
      Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered cells can converge on the same surface antigens in urothelial carcinoma (UC) yet depend on distinct biological steps. This creates a central uncertainty after ADC progression: whether failure reflects loss of membrane antigen or a downstream resistance mechanism that a CAR might bypass. We synthesize paired human tissue, molecular-imaging, ADC-resistance and UC-specific CAR-cell studies to examine whether an antigen targeted by a failed ADC remains suitable for cellular therapy. NECTIN4 after enfortumab vedotin (EV) provides the most direct evidence. Membranous expression often decreases between primary and metastatic UC, and serial observations document lesion-specific loss. However, selected post-EV biopsies and resistant models retain NECTIN4; in those models, NECTIN4 CAR T cells remain active. Transporter and payload-resistance studies further support target-independent failure. Evidence for HER2 and TROP2 is less direct but suggests that alternative antigens may remain available when NECTIN4 declines. We therefore propose a resistance-state framework: same-target CAR development requires recent evidence of accessible membrane antigen; target loss or marked heterogeneity favors target switching or multi-target strategies; and unresolved states require biomarker-rich testing. Current evidence does not support a clinical treatment sequence. Instead, it defines the sampling, biomarker and correlative-study requirements needed to make post-ADC CAR trials interpretable.
    Keywords:  Antibody-drug conjugate; CAR T cell; Drug resistance; Enfortumab vedotin; NECTIN4; Urothelial carcinoma
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2026.101383
  29. Front Immunol. 2026 ;17 1950465
      Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus/lupus nephritis (SLE/LN), and systemic sclerosis (SSc) remain major causes of chronic inflammation, disability, organ damage, and treatment burden despite therapeutic advances. RNA therapeutics offer programmable transcript suppression, network-level microRNA modulation, transient restoration of protective proteins, and targeting-ligand functions. Existing reviews largely catalogue modalities or individual delivery systems; this review instead asks whether a candidate forms an interpretable translational program across target biology, disease compartment, intended cell, productive intracellular access, direct target engagement, pathway pharmacodynamics, repeat-dose safety, and manufacturing feasibility. RA is primarily a synovial immune-stromal delivery problem in which RNA programs must also demonstrate an advantage over effective biologic or targeted synthetic therapies. SLE/LN offers interferon, B-cell, co-stimulatory, microRNA, messenger RNA (mRNA), and complement opportunities, but therapeutic nucleic acids and carriers must not intensify nucleic-acid sensing, interferon activity, or complement-associated injury. SSc combines strong antifibrotic RNA biology with an accessible skin proof-of-mechanism window, whereas lung, vascular, and internal-organ programs remain more delivery-limited. We separate human pathway validation, RNA-platform evidence outside the target disease, disease-specific RNA evidence, and patient efficacy. Recent human complement-factor-B pharmacodynamic data strengthen the platform-level evidence but do not establish efficacy in RA or LN. The most informative early trials will therefore be biomarker-enriched and mechanism-rich, with prespecified criteria that distinguish target failure from delivery, dose, endotype, or safety failure.
    Keywords:  RNA therapeutics; antisense oligonucleotides; drug delivery; lupus nephritis; rheumatoid arthritis; small interfering RNA; systemic lupus erythematosus; systemic sclerosis
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1950465
  30. Front Immunol. 2026 ;17 1954319
      Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) confronts the field with an apparent contradiction that is better understood as a causal consequence: the cytokine most central to antitumor immunity is also a principal driver of immune escape, and recombinant IFN-γ has both helped and harmed patients. We argue that this duality is not paradoxical but expected, escape is, in large part, the predictable evolutionary outcome of effective IFN-γ-mediated pressure. The prevailing "two faces" framing, which separates antitumor and protumor effects by dose and duration, names this discrepancy without explaining what couples its halves. Here, we reframe IFN-γ as a time-ordered IFN-γ Response Cycle: a recurring causal motif, productive execution, a self-limiting turn, and selectable resistance, running around one tunable IFNGR-JAK-STAT1-IRF1 backbone. We use "cycle" deliberately and in a restricted sense: not to imply that an individual tumor clone oscillates between sensitive and resistant states, but that this execute-feedback-select motif recurs across a tumor's heterogeneous clonal population and across successive rounds of immune pressure and therapy. Its reversible arc, adaptive feedback and non-genetic gating, can be therapeutically reopened, whereas genetic loss of the pathway constitutes a one-way exit from the cycle rather than a return within it. Its behavior is set less by signal magnitude than by decoding, which cells read the cytokine, at what intensity, in what spatial arrangement, and over what kinetics. Synthesizing evidence across tumor killing, antigen presentation, the cellular decoding network, adaptive and chronic feedback, genetic escape and induced phenotypic adaptation, therapeutic re-engineering, and biomarkers, we argue that resistance is largely manufactured by the very signaling that mediates control: by eliminating sensitive clones, IFN-γ selects for resistant clones. This recasts IFN-γ as a self-defeating selective force and reframes the therapeutic goal as decoupling killing from selection, preserving execution while severing the feedback and selection arc. IFN-γ biomarkers currently report the presence and dominance of an inflammatory, IFN-γ-driven state rather than a defined position within the cycle; longitudinal, spatial, and compartment-resolved measurements may eventually permit a finer classification.
    Keywords:  adaptive resistance; cancer immunotherapy; immune checkpoint blockade; interferon-γ; tumor immunoediting
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1954319
  31. Front Immunol. 2026 ;17 1942381
      In June 2026, satri-cel/CT041, a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product targeting Claudin18.2, received approval from China's National Medical Products Administration for the treatment of Claudin18.2-positive, HER2-negative advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma after failure of at least two prior lines of therapy. This marks the first CAR-T product approved worldwide for solid tumours. The approval ends the long-standing debate over whether CAR-T cells can be effective against solid malignancies, yet it simultaneously raises a more pointed issue: in its pivotal randomised controlled trial, median progression-free survival was 3.25 months (95% CI 2.86-4.53) with satri-cel against 1.77 months (95% CI 1.61-2.04) with treatment of physician's choice, giving a hazard ratio of 0.37 (95% CI 0.24-0.56). The two medians differ by 1.48 months; that figure marks where each survival distribution is cut in half and is not the benefit any individual patient can expect, and approval does not equate to a cure. Taking this as a starting point, this review systematically dissects the immunological bottlenecks that constrain CAR-T efficacy in gastrointestinal tumours. We first trace the evidence chain from phase I studies through the randomised controlled trial to exploratory adjuvant-therapy settings and then integrate the landscape of targets-Claudin18.2, glypican-3, carcinoembryonic antigen, mesothelin, and CDH17-within a target-tumour matrix encompassing gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and pancreatic cancer. The core section focuses on four intertwined immunological constraints: spatiotemporal heterogeneity and escape at the antigen level; a therapeutic window shaped jointly by epitope masking within tight junctions and immune privilege of the gastric mucosal stem cell niche-this mechanism not only explains why Claudin18.2-directed CAR-T cells exhibit an acceptable safety profile despite target expression on normal tissues but also provides a paradigm for rational selection of next-generation targets; a suppressive microenvironment composed of regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, tumour-associated macrophages, transforming growth factor-β, adenosine, and a hypoxic and acidotic metabolic milieu; and CAR-T exhaustion driven by chronic antigen stimulation. We particularly emphasise that metabolic stress and exhaustion are not two parallel obstacles. We put forward a mechanistic model in which persistent antigen stimulation combined with intratumoral hypoxia acts as a "double hit": through mitochondrial dysfunction and reactive oxygen species accumulation, the two inputs raise nuclear factor of activated T-cell (NFAT) activity and so drive the TOX/NR4A-dominated exhaustion program. This model is assembled from chronic-infection and mouse tumour systems and has not been tested in human CAR-T cells or in satri-cel-treated patients. We advance it as a framework for organising the four bottlenecks and for explaining why single-point interventions struggle to lift the efficacy ceiling, not as a demonstrated account. On this basis, we discuss strategies such as armouring, logic gating, transcription factor engineering, gene editing, and chemokine receptor modification, along with combination regimens involving checkpoint inhibition, oncolytic viruses, locoregional administration, and microbiome modulation, and we evaluate alternative platforms including CAR-macrophages, CAR-NK cells, and in vivo CAR-T generation. The watershed has been crossed, but the work of turning 3 months into 30 has only just begun.
    Keywords:  CAR-T cell therapy; Claudin18.2; T-cell exhaustion; gastrointestinal tumours; immunotherapy for solid tumours; therapeutic window; tumour microenvironment
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1942381
  32. Front Oncol. 2026 ;16 1957469
       Background: Programmable messenger RNA (mRNA) platforms can encode tumor antigens or immunomodulators, enabling coordinated antigen delivery and immune modulation. Yet the literature spans cancer vaccination, delivery engineering, immune biology, and adjacent infectious-disease research, making its structure and evidentiary boundaries difficult to discern. We mapped this cross-domain corpus to clarify its development, organization, and relevance to cancer-associated immune escape.
    Methods: We searched the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) and Scopus on July 29, 2026, for English-language Articles and Reviews published since 2006. The strategy combined programmable or therapeutic mRNA, cancer, and immune-escape-related concepts. R-based analyses summarized the number of publications (NP), total citations (TC), and collaboration patterns; BERTopic modeled titles and abstracts after entity-aware preprocessing. Independent two-author review supported the five topic labels and characterized the outliers, and robustness was assessed across alternative clustering configurations.
    Results: The dataset comprised 756 publications (NP = 756). Annual output increased more than fourfold in 2021 and reached NP = 182 in 2025. China (NP = 291; 38.49%) and the United States (NP = 146; 19.31%) accounted for nearly 58% of corresponding-author publications. Sichuan University and Frontiers in Immunology ranked first in institutional and journal output, respectively. Nature had the highest retained source-record citation total (TC = 2,326). BERTopic assigned 745 publications to five topics, while 11 of 756 records remained outliers (1.46%). The topics represented mRNA delivery and immunomodulatory cancer-vaccine research (52.1%), SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in oncology and immunotherapy settings (23.6%), therapeutic mRNA cancer-vaccine platforms (13.3%), tumor-antigen discovery and immune-subtype stratification (8.6%), and mRNA-vaccine immunogenicity during autoimmune immunosuppression (2.4%).
    Conclusions: Publication activity in the retrieved cross-domain corpus expanded rapidly after 2020. The corpus included both direct cancer-mRNA research and adjacent platform or immune-response literature. By distinguishing these components and identifying thematic connections among delivery, antigen selection, immune context, and collaboration, the analysis provides an evidence-navigation framework for prioritizing systematic reviews, mechanistic studies, and clinical evaluation. The map does not itself establish therapeutic efficacy.
    Keywords:  BERTopic; bibliometric analysis; cancer vaccine; lipid nanoparticle; neoantigen; programmable mRNA; topic modeling; tumor immune escape
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1957469
  33. Front Immunol. 2026 ;17 1961794
      Solid tumors are spatially heterogeneous ecosystems in which immune recruitment, anatomical access, functional competence, stromal organization, vascularization and physicochemical conditions vary across regions. The conventional "hot-cold" dichotomy therefore obscures the coexistence of immune-inflamed, immune-excluded, immune-suppressed and immune-desert territories within the same lesion. Intratumoral microorganisms add a second layer of heterogeneity, yet microbial signals are often interpreted from bulk abundance without resolving their location, host-cell compartment, viability or functional state. The distinct contribution of this review is the integration of spatial microbial signals with regional immune ecotypes defined independently from microbial presence. Immune-inflamed, immune-excluded, immune-desert, and immune-suppressed regions are assigned from host features of immune recruitment, access to malignant cells, functional competence, and multicellular organization before microbial localization, cellular compartmentalization, and biological state are considered. We examine how intracellular microbial material in malignant cells, phagocyte-associated signals, extracellular biofilms and bacteria-positive microniches may differentially engage HLA-mediated antigen presentation, cGAS-STING or direct STING signaling, TLR-MyD88-TRAF6 pathways, dendritic-cell and natural-killer-cell circuits, and myeloid, stromal and metabolic programs. Depending on microbial identity, burden, persistence and cellular address, these interactions may support cytotoxic immunity or promote chronic inflammation, suppressive myeloid accumulation, neutrophil extracellular traps, regulatory T-cell expansion, T-cell dysfunction and matrix-associated exclusion. We further assess physicochemical selection, microbial metabolism, metastatic persistence, treatment-associated remodeling and spatial multi-omic strategies for defining clinically relevant immunomicrobial niches. Current evidence remains limited by low biomass, contamination risk, incomplete source attribution, cross-sectional sampling and scarce causal validation. Future studies should combine multiregional and longitudinal sampling with orthogonal microbial detection, cell-resolved host profiling, viability and activity measurements, and controlled perturbation. This model reframes tumors as mosaics of regional immune ecotypes in which spatially localized microbial signals acquire context-dependent biological meaning.
    Keywords:  immune ecotypes; intratumoral microbiome; microbial microniches; spatial immunology; tumor immune microenvironment
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1961794
  34. Front Pharmacol. 2026 ;17 1913235
       Objective: Although several CAR-T products have been approved for hematologic malignancies, their post-marketing adverse-event reporting patterns may not be interchangeable. This study compared FAERS-derived positive signals across approved CAR-T products to distinguish recurrent class-related toxicities from product-skewed reporting patterns.
    Methods: FAERS reports from Q1 2014 to Q2 2025 were reviewed for CAR-T products. Demographic characteristics were summarized for seven products, whereas PT- and SOC-level signal analyses were restricted to six products with sufficient signal data: Breyanzi, Kymriah, Tecartus, Yescarta, Abecma, and Carvykti. Positive signals were detected using ROR, PRR, and BCPNN algorithms. After predefined exclusion of nonclinical or non-AE terms, indication- or disease-progression-related terms, procedure- or investigation-related terms, efficacy- or persistence-related terms, and product-quality-related terms, eligible signals were compared at the PT and SOC levels. Nonspecific MedDRA-coded PTs were retained if they met the predefined signal criteria, but they were interpreted descriptively and were not used to define product-level profile labels.
    Results: CRS was consistently among the leading PT-level signals across all six products. Yescarta and Tecartus showed higher reporting of ICANS and neurotoxicity-related PTs. Kymriah was more strongly represented by infection-, immune-, and hematologic-related signals, whereas Carvykti showed several neurologic PTs including Parkinsonism, cranial nerve paralysis, facial paralysis, and Bell's palsy. Abecma showed relatively high-ranking systemic symptom-related PTs, including fatigue, headache, and decreased appetite. At the SOC level, nervous system disorders and infections and infestations were among the most frequently represented categories, but their proportions differed across products.
    Conclusion: FAERS-based signal detection showed a common CAR-T reporting backbone centered on CRS, ICANS/neurotoxicity, hypotension, pyrexia, infection-related events, and hematologic events, together with product-skewed signal patterns. These findings represent disproportionality signals rather than comparative safety rankings, and FAERS data cannot establish causal relationships between CAR-T products and adverse events.
    Keywords:  CAR-T; FAERS; adverse events; pharmacovigilance; real-world study
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2026.1913235
  35. Annu Rev Med. 2026 Oct 23.
      T cell receptor-engineered T (TCR-T) cell therapy has emerged as a promising adoptive cellular therapy for solid tumors by enabling recognition of intracellular antigens presented via human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules. Unlike chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy, TCR-T cell therapy targets a broader antigen repertoire, including cancer-testis antigens, neoantigens, and viral antigens. Recent clinical advances, highlighted by the approval of afamitresgene autoleucel in synovial sarcoma, demonstrate meaningful antitumor activity. However, several limitations remain, including HLA restriction, antigen heterogeneity, toxicity related to on-target/off-tumor effects, and mechanisms of resistance such as antigen loss and T cell exhaustion. Advances in antigen selection, gene editing, and synthetic biology are improving both safety and efficacy. Combination strategies and next-generation engineered constructs are expected to overcome current barriers. This review summarizes the biological rationale, clinical evidence, safety considerations, and resistance mechanisms of TCR-T cell therapy in solid tumors and discusses future directions to optimize their therapeutic potential.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-042425-051841
  36. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2026 Oct 22. pii: 109. [Epub ahead of print]15(1):
      Cancer remains a formidable challenge in global oncology, with conventional treatments often failing to achieve durable responses in advanced stages. Adoptive cell therapy (ACT), despite its revolutionary success in hematological malignancies, faces critical bottlenecks in solid tumors, including a hostile immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), restricted cellular trafficking, and the rapid onset of T-cell exhaustion. This review systematically explores the evolution of ACT platforms, ranging from foundational tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) to precision-engineered chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T and T-cell receptor (TCR)-T therapies. We highlight how innovative engineering strategies such as the integration of "armored" CARs, synthetic gene circuits, and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing have been employed to enhance the persistence and polyfunctionality of effector cells. Beyond T-cell-centric approaches, we examine the emerging landscape of diverse immune effector cells, including CAR-natural killer (NK) cells, and CAR-macrophages (CAR-M), which offer unique advantages in antigen recognition and safety profiles. Furthermore, we detail the synergistic potential of multimodal combination regimens, where ACT is paired with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), localized radiotherapy, or nanotechnology-based delivery systems to dismantle TME barriers and achieve systemic anti-tumor immunity. By tracing the journey of therapeutic cells from ex vivo expansion to intratumoral infiltration and cytotoxicity, this review illuminates the molecular mechanisms governing therapeutic efficacy. Finally, we discuss the current clinical trial landscape, manufacturing hurdles, and the regulatory pathways essential for transitioning these sophisticated cellular products from bench to bedside.
    Keywords:  Adoptive cell therapy; CAR-T cells; Combination immunotherapy; Genetic engineering; Solid tumors; Tumor microenvironment
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40164-026-00848-3
  37. J Inflamm Res. 2026 ;19 638869
       Background: Chronic inflammation and persistent antigen stimulation reshape T-cell fate and contribute to immune dysfunction in cancer, chronic infection, and inflammatory liver disease. TOX (TOX1) has emerged as a key transcriptional regulator linking these inflammatory contexts to T-cell exhaustion, immune checkpoint signaling, and immunotherapy response. However, existing reviews have mainly summarized molecular mechanisms and have not systematically connected the evolution of the field with its collaboration patterns, research hotspots, and emerging translational questions. A synthesis that combines bibliometric mapping with biological interpretation is needed to clarify how the field has evolved and where translational uncertainties remain.
    Methods: Web of Science Core Collection, PubMed, and Embase were searched for TOX-related T-cell exhaustion studies published from 2010 to 2026. After deduplication and relevance screening, 180 publications were included. Bibliometric analyses were performed with bibliometrix, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace, and the resulting knowledge structures were interpreted through a mechanism-oriented narrative review.
    Results: Annual output increased markedly after the landmark TOX studies of 2019, reaching a peak in 2025. The field was highly concentrated: Frontiers in Immunology was the most productive venue, whereas Nature, Immunity, and Nature Immunology contained the most influential foundational papers. The USA and China dominated publication output, and their centrality scores were comparable (0.12 vs 0.13). However, their collaboration structures differed by partner distribution, with the USA more connected to high-output European partners and China contributing strongly to recent disease-focused translational work. Keyword and co-citation analyses converged on four themes: transcriptional programming, immune-checkpoint-associated dysfunction, tissue microenvironmental regulation, and translational intervention.
    Conclusion: TOX-related T-cell exhaustion should not be interpreted only as a binary marker of dysfunctional immunity. Instead, it represents a context-dependent regulatory interface between chronic inflammation, antigen persistence, tumor immune suppression, and therapeutic resistance. This perspective is essential for developing next-generation immunotherapies that modulate, rather than simply reverse, T-cell exhaustion in inflammatory and malignant microenvironments.
    Keywords:  T-cell exhaustion; TOX; bibliometric analysis; cancer immunity; chronic inflammation; immune checkpoint; immunotherapy resistance
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S638869
  38. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2026 Oct 23.
      Orphan drug development faces substantial economic and operational challenges, particularly in small patient populations where conventional industry-sponsored trials (ISTs) may be difficult to conduct. In Japan, investigator-initiated trials (IITs) have been used to support the development of treatments for rare diseases and other areas of high unmet medical need; however, the characteristics of orphan drug approvals supported by IITs compared with those supported by ISTs have not been fully evaluated. This study analyzed pivotal trials supporting orphan drug approvals in Japan between 2015 and 2024 and compared the trial and regulatory characteristics of IIT- and IST-supported approvals. Among 1,269 drugs approved, 260 orphan drugs were included in the final analysis. IITs were used as pivotal trials in 11.2% of approvals. All IITs were Japan-only trials, whereas 52.4% of ISTs involved global trials. The Japanese patient population coverage ratio was higher for IIT-supported than IST-supported approvals in the overall comparison (median 2.2% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.003). However, the difference was attenuated when the comparison was restricted to Japan-only ISTs. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified additional indications, Phase II trials, and smaller estimated target populations in Japan (100-999 patients) as characteristics associated with IIT-supported approvals. When the number of study sites was modeled continuously in a sensitivity analysis, fewer study sites were associated with IIT-supported approvals. Among orphan drugs approved in Japan, IIT-supported approvals showed distinct trial characteristics compared with IST-supported approvals. These findings describe characteristics of approved IIT-supported medicines and may inform future academia-led orphan drug development.
    Keywords:  Clinical trials; Drug development strategy; Investigator-initiated trials; Orphan drugs; Regulatory approval
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-026-01063-2
  39. FASEB J. 2026 Oct 31. pii: e72402. [Epub ahead of print]40(20):
      Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) develops within a chronically injured liver in which anti-tumor immunity is governed not only by immune-cell abundance and checkpoint signaling, but also by the spatial, mechanical, and multicellular organization of T lymphocytes. This review reframes T-cell architecture as a regulatory layer operating across molecular, cellular, and tissue scales. Cytoskeletal remodeling, immunological synapse geometry, mechanotransduction, vascular positioning, stromal exclusion, and tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) organization collectively influence T-cell activation thresholds, effector competence, exhaustion trajectories, and therapeutic responsiveness. We synthesize HCC-specific evidence from spatial transcriptomics, multiplex imaging, digital pathology, and clinical cohorts, while clearly distinguishing direct HCC observations from mechanisms extrapolated from other solid tumors or foundational T-cell biology. Current evidence supports the prognostic relevance of intratumoral CD8+ localisation, perivascular immune rims, fibrotic exclusion niches, and mature intratumoral TLS, but causal links between architecture and T-cell fate remain incompletely defined. We propose an architecture-guided framework in which spatial immune states serve as both biomarkers and modifiable therapeutic targets. Spatially informed checkpoint blockade, engineered T-cell therapy, stromal and vascular remodeling, AI-assisted pathology, and organoid or liver-on-chip models may enable more precise immunotherapy strategies for HCC.
    Keywords:  T‐cell architecture; hepatocellular carcinoma; immunotherapy; spatial immunology; spatial transcriptomics; tertiary lymphoid structures
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202603114R
  40. Front Bioinform. 2026 ;6 1919802
      Meningioma is the most common primary intracranial tumor, yet recurrent and high-grade disease has few durable systemic options, and, unlike hematological malignancies, no systematically filtered cell-surface antigen resource exists to guide chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T development. We address this gap not by nominating a trial-ready target but by building two reusable resources: an integrative meningioma surfaceome atlas and a transferable, gate-based framework that separates transcriptomic discovery from CAR-T target nomination. Analyzing single-cell RNA sequencing from eight meningioma patients (GSE183655; 80,220 quality-controlled cells), patient-aware differential expression followed by a curated surfaceome filter (UniProt plasma-membrane localization; extracellular domain ≥20 aa; exclusion of ribosomal, nuclear, cytoplasmic, and secreted proteins) reduced 83 scored candidates to 13 bona fide plasma-membrane (Tier A) antigens, removing prominent false positives such as the nuclear proteins FOXC1 and MGMT, the cytoplasmic enzyme lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA), and the secreted protein PTGDS. Because expression ranking establishes discovery but not CAR-T suitability, we then applied explicit nomination gates: a systemic-safety score integrating whole-body GTEx transcriptomics with Human Protein Atlas protein-level evidence; a membrane-topology tractability gate distinguishing antibody-accessible single-pass and GPI-anchored ectodomains from multi-pass transporters and tail-anchored proteins; and a safety × coverage metric. Under stringent thresholds (combined safety ≥0.55, tumor-cell detection fraction ≥50%, safety × coverage ≥0.30), no Tier A antigen qualified. Ubiquitously expressed antigens were correctly demoted, including the tetraspanin CD9 (53.2% tumor-cell coverage but pan-tissue protein expression and high plasma abundance), and the highest-ranked transporter SLC7A2 was demoted by multi-pass topology (largest extracellular loop 38 aa) despite favorable transcriptomic safety. Leukemia inhibitory factor receptor (LIFR), a single-pass type I receptor with a contiguous 789-aa ectodomain, was the only antibody-tractable nominee for experimental follow-up yet remained liability laden (combined safety 0.41; safety × coverage 0.135) and is not a validated target. Cross-dataset expression overlap (93.3%) reflected mRNA reproducibility, not CAR-T validity or clinical validation, and generic-antibody docking was exploratory only. All findings are transcriptomic and require surface-level confirmation. This work contributes a reproducible meningioma surfaceome atlas and a transferable nomination framework and shows that rigorous gating leaves no single antigen with a favorable safety × coverage × tractability profile, motivating bispecific and logic-gated CAR-T strategies.
    Keywords:  CAR T-cell therapy; bispecific CAR-T; membrane topology; meningioma; on-target off-tumor toxicity; single-cell RNA sequencing; surfaceome; tumor-associated antigen
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fbinf.2026.1919802
  41. Front Immunol. 2026 ;17 1927857
       Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a standard treatment for several hematological malignancies, yet patient-specific responses and toxicities remain hard to predict. Although multiple covariates and risk scores exist, their prognostic accuracy remains limited.
    Methods: We prospectively measured CAR T-cell kinetics in peripheral blood of 92 patients with B-cell malignancies using multicolor flow cytometry. To explore underlying mechanisms, we developed a mechanistic model of CAR T-cell and tumor cell interactions.
    Results: We captured four phases of CAR T-cell kinetics in peripheral blood: distribution, expansion, contraction, and persistence. Patients with weak expansion or deep contraction are more likely to relapse. When fitted to the 46 patients with suDicient data points, the model reproduces individual CAR T-cell kinetics but fails to predict outcomes using uniform tumor parameters. We demonstrate that identical CAR T-cell dynamics may result from diDerent tumor features, including growth rate, initial burden, or antigen density. Accurately estimating these tumor-specific factors may improve relapse prediction, while common surrogates like blood lactate dehydrogenase, International Prognostic Index score, or Ann-Arbor stage do not.
    Conclusion: We conclude that CAR T-cell kinetics within the first month can serve as early prognostic markers. Integrating tumor burden estimates is required to reconcile kinetics with individual outcomes and may, upon prospective validation, further improve risk stratification in patients with B-cell malignancies receiving CAR T-cell therapy.
    Keywords:  B-cell lymphoma; CAR T-cell kinetics; antigen density; mathematical model; ordinary differential equations; predictive biomarkers; treatment outcome; tumor burden
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1927857
  42. Case Rep Pathol. 2026 ;2026 6303492
      Plasmablastic lymphoma is a rare, aggressive large B cell lymphoma characterized by plasmablastic morphology, terminal B cell (plasma cell) differentiation, frequent loss of conventional B cell markers, and poor clinical outcomes. Although classically associated with immunodeficiency and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, plasmablastic lymphoma has also been described as an uncommon mechanism of relapse after CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy. We report a 69-year-old man with a remote history of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma and subsequent refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who developed rapidly progressive, CD19-negative plasmablastic lymphoma approximately 1 month after CD19-directed CAR-T therapy. Although DLBCL was of a nongerminal-center phenotype with expression of pan-B markers including CD19 and lack of CD138, the post-CAR-T transformed lymphoma demonstrated acquisition of plasmablastic morphology and CD138 expression, loss of pan-B markers and negative for EBV by in situ hybridization and HHV8 by immunostaining. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on the plasmablastic lymphoma showed a MYC::IGH fusion and low-level MYC copy gain that were absent in the antecedent DLBCL. Disease dissemination was later confirmed on left pleural fluid cytology a few days before the patient passed away. This case highlights EBV and HHV8 negative plasmablastic transformation as a rare but important post-CAR-T relapse pattern and underscores the need for repeat biopsy, comprehensive paired immunophenotyping, and molecular studies in patients with atypical progression after cellular therapy.
    Keywords:  CAR T cell therapy; CD19 antigen escape; EBV negative; diffuse large B cell lymphoma; plasmablastic lymphoma
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1155/crip/6303492
  43. J Imaging Inform Med. 2026 Oct 21.
      Medical world models simulate how a patient's imaged state evolves over time and, in some systems, under clinical interventions. Their value comes from multi-step, action-conditioned roll-outs, yet evaluation is still dominated by perceptual or single-step metrics. We treat assessment of these models as a verification problem, distinct from later evidence of clinical benefit, and organize it around three axes. Simulation fidelity asks whether predicted states are correct at the level claimed by the model. Roll-out stability asks whether that correctness is maintained over multiple steps; we summarize this using an effective planning horizon, defined as the last step before a stated loss quantile first exceeds a clinical tolerance under the observed action policy. Clinical plausibility and reliability ask whether simulated responses are counterfactually consistent, calibrated, and adequate across patient subgroups. We also propose a claim-proportionate reporting standard and a reproducible procedure for estimating the horizon from retrospective data. Applying the framework to a purposively selected sample of nine imaging world models, we find that reported evidence is uneven across capability tiers. Under the proposed standard, every model claiming action-conditioned prediction or above omits at least one applicable item: none reports an explicit counterfactual-consistency check or a clinically meaningful subgroup analysis of the type specified in Item 7, and none reports an effective planning horizon at a stated clinical tolerance. Because the effective planning horizon is estimated on-policy, it should not be interpreted as evidence of off-policy counterfactual reliability.
    Keywords:  Clinical decision support; Medical simulation; Model verification; Reporting standards; Roll-out stability; World models
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-026-02413-0
  44. Support Care Cancer. 2026 Oct 23. pii: 1149. [Epub ahead of print]34(11):
       PURPOSE: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the primary curative option for many hematologic malignancies, yet its substantial risks make the treatment decision highly complex and high stakes for patients. Although current qualitative studies have explored how patients perceive HSCT, a comprehensive synthesis of these insights is still lacking. This study synthesizes existing research on patient perceptions of HSCT to guide shared decision-making in clinical practice.
    METHODS: A literature search was conducted across eight databases: PubMed, CINAHL, PsycARTICLES, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, spanning from their respective inceptions to February 2026. The Joanna Briggs Institute criteria for qualitative research were utilized to evaluate the quality of the studies, and a content analysis approach was employed to integrate the findings.
    RESULTS: A total of 20 studies were included, yielding 4 new integrated findings: (1) constrained choices; (2) decision-making embedded in relational contexts; (3) the hidden toll: financial constraints and logistical hurdles; (4) concerns about restricted social participation and threats to identity caused by transplantation.
    CONCLUSION: HSCT decision-making is shaped not only by clinical risks and benefits, but also by constrained choice, relational contexts, practical circumstances, and concerns about future life. SDM-based decision support should therefore extend beyond information provision to clarify patients' understanding of the decision space, identify factors that constrain choice, and address the values and longer-term concerns that matter to them.
    Keywords:  Decision-making; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Qualitative research; Systematic review
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-11381-8
  45. Extracell Vesicles Circ Nucl Acids. 2026 ;7(3): 1345-1368
      Extracellular vesicle (EV) therapeutics are progressing from broad proof-of-concept studies toward product-specific engineering and clinically defined applications. Native EVs offer biological membrane functions and the capacity to transport diverse molecular cargoes, but their therapeutic performance is limited by low cargo stoichiometry, rapid mononuclear phagocyte system clearance, clearance-dominated biodistribution, and inefficient functional cargo release. This Review examines how EV engineering strategies are used to address these barriers. We compare approaches for cargo loading, circulation control, tissue- and cell-selective targeting, and intracellular delivery, while considering the immunogenicity and manufacturing risks introduced by engineering. We also assess recent preclinical and clinical progress, including programs that were paused or discontinued, and discuss the practical constraints of cost, supply chain, and cold-chain distribution. Current evidence suggests that engineered EVs are unlikely to replace established lipid nanoparticles or viral vectors across all applications. Their near-term value is more likely to arise in localized delivery, immune-microenvironment modulation, complex cargo delivery, and defined cell-targeting settings in which biological membrane functions provide a measurable advantage.
    Keywords:  Extracellular vesicles; bioengineering; drug delivery; engineered extracellular vesicles; therapeutic translation
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.20517/evcna.2026.85
  46. J Vis Exp. 2026 Oct 21.
      Electric power organizations must classify heterogeneous data assets before applying access, retention, and cybersecurity controls. This study presents a metadata-only protocol that combines a fixed large language model (LLM) prompt, structured JSON output, deterministic screening, and mandatory human adjudication across five governance classes. The protocol was evaluated on 240 metadata records from 10 business domains. Raw LLM predictions agreed with adjudicated human labels for 207 records (86.25%; macro-F1 = 0.827), outperforming an exploratory deterministic rule baseline (66.67%) and a majority-class baseline (41.25%). Eighty-two records (34.17%) were routed to manual review; after adjudication, all 82 matched the reference labels. Five unsafe downgrades involved Critical Operational records and were intercepted by the review pathway. The workflow is limited to metadata and does not process raw documents, full tables, telemetry, or logs. These findings support LLM use as a triage aid rather than an autonomous classifier for metadata in electric power data governance.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3791/72425
  47. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2026 Oct 20.
       PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize recent advances in systemic sclerosis (SSc) highlighted at the 2026 World Scleroderma Congress, focusing on early disease, immunovascular mechanisms, and emerging therapeutic strategies.
    RECENT FINDINGS: Recent data support a paradigm shift in SSc, demonstrating that disease onset occurs during a very early phase (VEDOSS) characterized by early immune activation and microvascular dysfunction. Type I interferon-driven pathways are increasingly implicated in vascular and myocardial involvement, reinforcing the concept of a shared immunovascular axis across organ systems. Advances in multimodal imaging and circulating biomarkers enable detection of subclinical organ disease, while multi-omic and data-driven approaches are redefining disease subsets beyond traditional classifications. In parallel, novel therapeutic strategies - including targeted immune modulation, autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT), and emerging CAR-T approaches - are driving a transition toward earlier, mechanism-based intervention.
    SUMMARY: Systemic sclerosis is increasingly understood as a dynamic continuum of autoimmune/inflammatory and fibrotic mechanisms that can be identified through imaging, biohumoral, and functional insights, thus enabling a very early/early diagnosis, a risk stratification, and a precision-based therapeutic approach.
    Keywords:  World Scleroderma Congress; interferon; systemic sclerosis; therapies; very early diagnosis of systemic sclerosis
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1097/BOR.0000000000001204
  48. JMIR AI. 2026 Oct 19. 5 e104586
       BACKGROUND: Identifying individuals on parole or probation can help inform care pathways and ensure continuity of care in health care systems. However, this sensitive justice-related information is often absent from structured electronic health record fields and is instead documented in narrative clinical notes. Developing automated parole and probation detection (PPD) systems typically requires expert-annotated clinical data, but manual annotation is costly, time-consuming, and constrained by data sparsity and privacy concerns.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and evaluate a synthetic-only training paradigm for PPD from clinical text that eliminates the need for expert-annotated training data while maintaining strong performance and cross-domain transfer to real-world data.
    METHODS: We developed Synth-PPD, a synthetic dataset comprising 7579 labeled clinical notes generated using large language models (LLMs), redundancy filtering, and automated quality evaluation. Dataset quality was assessed through human review of 1517 synthetic notes by 2 annotators. The primary outcome was the macro-F1-score for PPD. We evaluated Synth-PPD across unsupervised and supervised learning settings using LLMs, traditional machine learning models, and transformer encoders. Performance was assessed on 293 expert-annotated real-world clinical notes from the US Department of Veterans Affairs.
    RESULTS: Synth-PPD achieved 90.05% human-LLM alignment. In the unsupervised setting, Llama 3.3-70B-Instruct with chain-of-thought prompting and few-shot examples from Synth-PPD achieved a macro-F1-score of 87.22%, outperforming both the corresponding zero-shot model (80.10%) and the best rule-based baseline (77.55%; P<.001 for all comparisons). In the supervised setting, Llama 3.1-8B fine-tuned on Synth-PPD achieved a macro-F1-score of 81.43%, exceeding the best rule-based baseline (77.55%; P<.001) and achieving a numerically higher score than the substantially larger zero-shot Llama 3.3-70B-Instruct model (80.10%; P=.08). In contrast, traditional machine learning models and transformer encoders exhibited greater performance degradation under domain shift and derived limited benefit from increasing synthetic training data. Additional experiments showed that increasing synthetic training data improved cross-domain performance for LLM-based models but yielded comparatively smaller gains for traditional approaches.
    CONCLUSIONS: Synthetic data generated by LLMs can serve as a scalable, cost-effective, and privacy-preserving alternative to expert-annotated real-world clinical data for PPD from clinical text. The findings demonstrate successful cross-domain transfer to real-world US Department of Veterans Affairs clinical notes.
    Keywords:  clinical natural language processing; electronic health records; large language models; legal status classification; parole and probation detection; synthetic data
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2196/104586
  49. Int J Pharm. 2026 Oct 23. pii: S0378-5173(26)01038-0. [Epub ahead of print] 127589
      Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-cell therapy has emerged as a revolutionary approach to treat various diseases, including cancers and non-cancer diseases. However, as a type of living drug, the therapeutic performance and persistence of CAR cells can be markedly affected by multiple factors, from in vitro manufacturing to in vivo conditions. In recent years, bioactive materials, especially hydrogel-based strategies, have emerged as powerful tools to improve ex vivo and in vivo CAR-cell therapy. In brief, engineered hydrogels might regulate CAR-cell expansion or activation states during manufacturing and as models for cell functional assessments in vitro; in vivo, hydrogels might preserve CAR cells and regulate their retention, release and tissue infiltration while reprogramming adverse disease microenvironments. Despite promising advances, the progress, limitations and future directions of this field have not been comprehensively evaluated. In this mini-review, we evaluate the framework of hydrogel-based strategies in boosting CAR-cell therapy over the past five years, from cell manufacturing to functional improvement. Together, current findings suggest that engineered hydrogels provide spatial and temporal cues to enhance CAR-cell manufacturing and therapeutic capacity. This review might provide insights into design principles for developing tailored hydrogels to improve CAR-cell therapies to treat diverse types of diseases.
    Keywords:  Autoimmune disease; Biomaterials; Cancer; Cell manufacturing; Chimeric antigen receptor; Hydrogel; Immunotherapy
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2026.127589
  50. Eur J Cancer. 2026 Oct 16. pii: S0959-8049(26)01563-7. [Epub ahead of print]249 117781
       INTRODUCTION: Anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy has improved outcomes in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL), but only about half of patients achieve durable benefit. As CD20 is expressed in > 90% of B-NHL, this phase I trial evaluated the CD20-directed CAR T-cell product MB-CART20.1 in adults with relapsed/refractory CD20-positive B-NHL without curative treatment options.
    METHODS: In this phase I dose-escalation trial, patients received 1.0 × 10⁵ cells/kg body weight (BW) MB-CART20.1 at the safety dose level (SDL) or 1.0 × 10⁶ cells/kg BW at dose level 1 (DL1).
    RESULTS: Recruitment was terminated early because of the COVID-19 pandemic after nine heavily pretreated patients had received MB-CART20.1 (SDL n = 7; DL1 n = 2). Diagnoses included transformed follicular lymphoma (n = 4), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 3), Richter transformation from chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL, n = 1), and small lymphocytic lymphoma (n = 1). One dose-limiting toxicity (DLT; grade 4 neutropenia) occurred at DL1; the maximum tolerated dose was not determined. No grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome occurred (grade 1: n = 4; grade 2: n = 1). One patient developed grade 2 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. The best overall response rate was 56%, including 33% complete responses (CR; SDL n = 1; DL1 n = 2). CRs were durable, with one maintained through 5 years of follow-up. CAR T-cells showed robust expansion, with higher Cmax at DL1 than SDL (125.9 vs. 3.1 cells/µL). Cmax and AUC0-28D were higher in responders (p = 0.0369).
    CONCLUSION: With manageable toxicity, no DLTs at SDL, and preliminary signs of efficacy in the overall trial cohort, these findings warrant further investigation of CD20-directed CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed/refractory B-NHL.
    Keywords:  Adoptive immunotherapy; Anti-CD20 CAR T-cell therapy; Chimeric antigen receptor; Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; Non-Hodgkin lymphoma; Richter transformation; Small lymphocytic lymphoma; Transformed follicular lymphoma
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2026.117781
  51. J Law Med Ethics. 2026 Oct 19. 1-3
      Words can have inherently multiple meanings; therefore, semantics can directly impact policies and behaviours. In regulatory practice, semantics refers to the specific, actionable meaning behind terminology, and attention to semantics can help ensure that legal frameworks are interpreted accurately. Refining semantics is not a purely theoretical exercise, but a subtle yet powerful element that has the potential to make the regulatory system more efficient in setting priorities and more reliable in meeting societal expectations and needs. When their intended purpose does not align with their true meaning, labels widely used in pharmaceutical regulation such as "breakthrough," "orphans," or "unmet medical need" risks undermining the clarity and precision essential to a sound regulatory framework. In addition, differences in definitions, scopes, eligibility criteria, and incentives can obstruct the efficient convergence of efforts in drug development and access. As pharmaceutical investments and clinical research increasingly transcend borders, the adoption of consistent terminology and regulatory definitions becomes crucial. This alignment can enhance cooperation among investors, governments, regulators, researchers, health care practitioners, and patients.
    Keywords:  Breakthrough; Medicines regulation; Rare Diseases; Unmet Medical Need
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2026.10293