bims-cyhorp 2022-08-21 papers

Issue of 2022‒08‒21
four papers selected by
Piotr Okupski,

NPJ Precis Oncol. 2022 Aug 16. 6(1): 56

Comparative biomarker analysis of PALOMA-2/3 trials for palbociclib.

While cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, including palbociclib, combined with endocrine therapy (ET), are becoming the standard-of-care for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‒negative metastatic breast cancer, further mechanistic insights are needed to maximize benefit from the treatment regimen. Herein, we conducted a systematic comparative analysis of gene expression/progression-free survival relationship from two phase 3 trials (PALOMA-2 [first-line] and PALOMA-3 [≥second-line]). In the ET-only arm, there was no inter-therapy line correlation. However, adding palbociclib resulted in concordant biomarkers independent of initial ET responsiveness, with shared sensitivity genes enriched in estrogen response and resistance genes over-represented by mTORC1 signaling and G2/M checkpoint. Biomarker patterns from the combination arm resembled patterns observed in ET in advanced treatment-naive patients, especially patients likely to be endocrine-responsive. Our findings suggest palbociclib may recondition endocrine-resistant tumors to ET, and may guide optimal therapeutic sequencing by partnering CDK4/6 inhibitors with different ETs. Pfizer (NCT01740427; NCT01942135).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-022-00297-1

Support Care Cancer. 2022 Aug 16.

Infectious complications of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors in patients with hormone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Onur Bas, Enes Erul, Deniz Can Guven, Sercan Aksoy.

AIM: The combination of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors plus endocrine therapy (ET) improved the survival outcomes and became the standard of care in the treatment of metastatic hormone-positive breast cancer. However, these combinations increased the risk of neutropenia compared with ET alone. While the infection-related mortalities did not seem to be increased, the exact risk of infections with CDK 4/6 inhibitor and ET combinations is relatively understudied. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of CDK 4/6 inhibitor clinical trials to assess the infection risk of adding CDK4/6 inhibitors to ET.MATERIAL AND METHOD: We systemically searched the PubMed database for relevant clinical trials. For each study, all grade and grade 3 or higher infections, upper respiratory tract infections (URTI), urinary tract infections (UTI), pneumonia, and febrile neutropenia rates were recorded whenever available. The hazard ratios (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of infection risk were calculated via the generic inverse-variance method with a random-effects model.
RESULTS: Nine eligible studies were included in the analyses (MONALEESA-2,3,7, MONARCH-2,3, MONARCH plus, PALOMA-1,2,3). In the meta-analysis of these studies, CDK 4/6 inhibitors plus ET arms were associated with increased all grade infections (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.56-2.01, p < 0.00001), grade 3 or higher infections, (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.28-2.43, p = 0.0005), UTIs (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.19-2.12, p = 0.002), and febrile neutropenia (HR 4.28, 95% CI 1.73-10.62, p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, we observed that adding CDK4/6 inhibitors to ET significantly increased the risk of all grade, grade 3 or higher infections, and urinary tract infections. We propose that closer follow-up for infections should be considered for metastatic breast cancer patients using CDK 4/6 inhibitors. This may help clinicians to recognize infections earlier which prevents early death from infection.

Keywords: Abemaciclib; Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors; Infection; Neutropenia; Palbociclib; Ribociclib

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07320-y

Sci China Life Sci. 2022 Aug 11.

Overexpressed Cyclin D1 and CDK4 proteins are responsible for the resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitor in breast cancer that can be reversed by PI3K/mTOR inhibitors.

Zijie Cai, Jingru Wang, Yudong Li, Qianfeng Shi, Liang Jin, Shunying Li, Mengdi Zhu, Qi Wang, Lok Lam Wong, Wang Yang, Hongna Lai, Chang Gong, Yandan Yao, Yujie Liu, Jun Zhang, Herui Yao, Qiang Liu.

CDK4/6 inhibitors are the standard treatment in advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients. Nevertheless, the resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors is inevitable and the strategies to overcome resistance are of great interest. Here, we show that the palbociclib-resistant breast cancer cells expressed significantly higher levels of Cyclin D1 and CDK4 proteins because of upregulated protein synthesis. Silencing Cyclin D1 or CDK4 led to cell cycle arrest while silencing Cyclin E1 or CDK2 restored the sensitivity to palbociclib. Furthermore, PI3K/mTOR pathway was hyper-activated in palbociclib-resistant cells, leading to more phosphorylated 4E-BP1 and higher levels of Cyclin D1 and CDK4 translation. Targeting PI3K/mTOR pathway with a specific PI3Kα inhibitor (BYL719) or an mTOR inhibitor (everolimus) reduced the protein levels of Cyclin D1 and CDK4, and restored the sensitivity to palbociclib. The tumor samples expressed significantly higher levels of Cyclin D1, CDK4, p-AKT and p-4E-BP1 after progression on palbociclib treatment. In conclusion, our findings suggest that overexpressed Cyclin D1 and CDK4 proteins lead to the resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitor and PI3K/mTOR inhibitors are able to restore the sensitivity to CDK4/6 inhibitors, which provides the biomarker and rationale for the combinational use of CDK4/6 inhibitors and PI3K/mTOR inhibitors after CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance in breast cancer.

Keywords: CDK4; CDK4/6 inhibitor; Cyclin D1; PI3K/mTOR inhibitor; resistance

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-021-2140-8

Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 Aug 18.

Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with palbociclib-based therapies: real-world data in the Han population.

Hongnan Mo, Fei Ma, Qing Li, Pin Zhang, Peng Yuan, Jiayu Wang, Yang Luo, Ruigang Cai, Qiao Li, Binghe Xu.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to reveal the treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of diverse palbociclib-based regimens in Han patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer in routine clinical practice.METHODS: The clinical data of patients with ER+ metastatic breast cancer treated with palbociclib were collected from the National Cancer Center database. The efficacy profile of palbociclib in this Han population was evaluated, especially for various combination regimens. The efficacy of palbociclib-based therapy in patients with prior everolimus treatment was also assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 186 patients from 89 cities in 18 provinces in China were enrolled. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was similar among different palbociclib-combined groups (P = 0.566): 10.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.8-16.1) in the +exemestane group, 9.7 months (95% CI 6.3-13.1) in the +letrozole group, 7.8 months (95% CI 5.5-10.2) in the +fulvestrant group, 7.2 months (95% CI 3.2-11.3) in the +toremifene group, and 6.1 months (95% CI 1.2-11.0) in the +anastrozole group. Thirty-four patients (18.3%) had received everolimus for their metastatic disease before the prescription of palbociclib. The disease control rate was significantly lower in patients who had received previous everolimus than in the everolimus-naïve group (50.0% vs. 82.2%, P < 0.001). Patients pre-treated with everolimus had significantly worse PFS than those in the everolimus-naïve group (3.4 months vs. 8.8 months, P = 0.001). After propensity score matching, patients pre-treated with everolimus had similar PFS (4.4 months, 95% CI 0.5-8.2) compared with everolimus-naïve patients (6.1 months, 95% CI 4.7-7.5, P = 0.439).
CONCLUSIONS: Various palbociclib-based regimens have promising efficacy in ER+ metastatic breast cancer in real-world settings, even in patients who had been pre-treated with everolimus.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002240