bims-dinmec Biomed News
on DNA methylation in cancer
Issue of 2026–09–27
two papers selected by
Lorena Ancona, Humanitas Research



  1. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2026 Sep 25. pii: 226. [Epub ahead of print]57(1):
      Recurrence remains a major cause of treatment failure after curative-intent therapy for resectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Clinicopathological staging, pathological response, serum tumor markers, and imaging incompletely identify patients with molecular residual disease (MRD). Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has therefore emerged as a minimally invasive biomarker for perioperative risk stratification, response assessment, postoperative MRD detection, and recognition of molecular recurrence before radiographic relapse. In gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer, postoperative ctDNA positivity has shown the most reproducible association with recurrence and survival, while serial studies indicate that early clearance during neoadjuvant therapy, persistence after preoperative therapy, and residual ctDNA after surgery or adjuvant chemotherapy represent distinct molecular states. However, several barriers remain: assay heterogeneity, variable sampling windows, clonal hematopoiesis, low shedding in diffuse-type and peritoneal-predominant disease, limited negative predictive value, and the absence of randomized evidence that ctDNA-guided intervention improves survival. Lessons from colorectal cancer are cautionary: randomized escalation and de-escalation trials have not uniformly translated strong prognostic validity into clinical utility. This review summarizes perioperative ctDNA evidence in resectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, compares tumor-informed and tumor-agnostic platforms, examines peritoneal and molecular-subtype-specific limitations, and proposes a trial-ready framework for escalation, de-escalation, and molecular surveillance. At present, ctDNA is suitable for risk stratification and clinical-trial enrollment as an adjunct to, rather than a replacement for, conventional surveillance; it is not ready for routine treatment adaptation outside prospective studies.
    Keywords:  Circulating tumor DNA; Gastric cancer; Gastroesophageal junction cancer; Immunotherapy; Molecular residual disease; Perioperative therapy; Recurrence; Treatment adaptation
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-026-01598-5
  2. Front Oncol. 2026 ;16 1899836
       Introduction: Ovarian cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality among women because of its asymptomatic early course, delayed diagnosis, and frequent presentation at advanced stages. Germline and somatic mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes significantly increase the risk of ovarian cancer by impairing homologous recombination DNA repair, resulting in genomic instability. Beyond their role in carcinogenesis, BRCA mutations have become important prognostic and predictive biomarkers, influencing treatment response and clinical outcomes. This review summarizes current evidence regarding the impact of BRCA1/2 status on prognosis and therapeutic strategies in ovarian cancer.
    Methods: A literature review was conducted using the PubMed and Scopus databases. English-language articles published between 2016 and 2026 were identified using combinations of the keywords ovarian cancer, BRCA1, BRCA2, PARP inhibitors, homologous recombination deficiency, and treatment. Original studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and relevant clinical trials were included.
    Results: The available evidence demonstrates that patients carrying BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations generally experience improved progression-free survival and, in many studies, prolonged overall survival compared with non-carriers. This survival advantage is largely attributed to increased sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy and the efficacy of PARP inhibitors, which exploit synthetic lethality in homologous recombination-deficient tumors. The literature also emphasizes the importance of universal BRCA testing to optimize treatment selection, identify candidates for maintenance PARP inhibitor therapy, and facilitate genetic counseling. In addition, emerging mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitors remain a significant therapeutic challenge.
    Conclusion: BRCA1/2 mutation status is a key biomarker in the management of ovarian cancer, supporting personalized treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes. Further research is needed to identify novel predictive biomarkers, overcome therapeutic resistance, and develop more effective targeted therapies.
    Keywords:  BRCA 1/2 mutation; BRCA1/2; HRD (homologous recombination deficiency); PARPi; PARPi resistance; genetic testing; ovarian cancer; treatment
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1899836