bims-ershed 2022-08-14 papers

Issue of 2022‒08‒14
five papers selected by
Matías Eduardo González Quiroz
Worker’s Hospital

Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2022 Aug 08. pii: a041262. [Epub ahead of print]

Evolutionary Aspects of the Unfolded Protein Response.

The unfolded protein response (UPR) is activated when unfolded proteins accumulate in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The basic mechanism of the UPR in maintaining ER homeostasis has been clarified from yeast to humans. The UPR is triggered by one or more transmembrane proteins in the ER. The number of canonical UPR sensors/transducers has increased during evolution, from one (IRE1) in yeast to three (IRE1, PERK, and ATF6) in invertebrates and five (IRE1α, IRE1β, PERK, ATF6α, and ATF6β) in vertebrates. Here, I initially describe the four major changes that have occurred during evolution: (1) advent of PERK in metazoans; (2) switch in transcription factor downstream of IRE1 in metazoans; (3) switch in regulator of ER chaperone induction in vertebrates; and (4) increase in the number of ATF6-like local factors in vertebrates. I then discuss the causes of the phenotypes of vertebrate knockout animals and refer to regulated IRE1-dependent decay of mRNAs.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a041262

J Chem Inf Model. 2022 Aug 12.

QM/MM Well-Tempered Metadynamics Study of the Mechanism of XBP1 mRNA Cleavage by Inositol Requiring Enzyme 1α RNase.

Sayyed Jalil Mahdizadeh, Emil Pålsson, Antonio Carlesso, Eric Chevet, Leif A Eriksson.

A range of in silico methodologies were herein employed to study the unconventional XBP1 mRNA cleavage mechanism performed by the unfolded protein response (UPR) mediator Inositol Requiring Enzyme 1α (IRE1). Using Protein-RNA molecular docking along with a series of extensive restrained/unrestrained atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, the dynamical behavior of the system was evaluated and a reliable model of the IRE1/XBP1 mRNA complex was constructed. From a series of well-converged quantum mechanics molecular mechanics well-tempered metadynamics (QM/MM WT-MetaD) simulations using the Grimme dispersion interaction corrected semiempirical parametrization method 6 level of theory (PM6-D3) and the AMBER14SB-OL3 force field, the free energy profile of the cleavage mechanism was determined, along with intermediates and transition state structures. The results show two distinct reaction paths based on general acid-general base type mechanisms, with different activation energies that perfectly match observations from experimental mutagenesis data. The study brings unique atomistic insights into the cleavage mechanism of XBP1 mRNA by IRE1 and clarifies the roles of the catalytic residues H910 and Y892. Increased understanding of the details in UPR signaling can assist in the development of new therapeutic agents for its modulation.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00735

PLoS One. 2022 ;17(8): e0271695

Newly synthesized mRNA escapes translational repression during the acute phase of the mammalian unfolded protein response.

Mohammed R Alzahrani, Bo-Jhih Guan, Leah L Zagore, Jing Wu, Chien-Wen Chen, Donny D Licatalosi, Kristian E Baker, Maria Hatzoglou.

Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) stress, caused by the accumulation of misfolded proteins in the ER, elicits a homeostatic mechanism known as the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR). The UPR reprograms gene expression to promote adaptation to chronic ER stress. The UPR comprises an acute phase involving inhibition of bulk protein synthesis and a chronic phase of transcriptional induction coupled with the partial recovery of protein synthesis. However, the role of transcriptional regulation in the acute phase of the UPR is not well understood. Here we analyzed the fate of newly synthesized mRNA encoding the protective and homeostatic transcription factor X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1) during this acute phase. We have previously shown that global translational repression induced by the acute UPR was characterized by decreased translation and increased stability of XBP1 mRNA. We demonstrate here that this stabilization is independent of new transcription. In contrast, we show XBP1 mRNA newly synthesized during the acute phase accumulates with long poly(A) tails and escapes translational repression. Inhibition of newly synthesized RNA polyadenylation during the acute phase decreased cell survival with no effect in unstressed cells. Furthermore, during the chronic phase of the UPR, levels of XBP1 mRNA with long poly(A) tails decreased in a manner consistent with co-translational deadenylation. Finally, additional pro-survival, transcriptionally-induced mRNAs show similar regulation, supporting the broad significance of the pre-steady state UPR in translational control during ER stress. We conclude that the biphasic regulation of poly(A) tail length during the UPR represents a previously unrecognized pro-survival mechanism of mammalian gene regulation.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271695

J Cell Physiol. 2022 Aug 12.

The role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in the regulation of long noncoding RNAs in cancer.

Nasim Ebrahimi, Jamileh Saremi, Masoud Ghanaatian, Elnaz Yazdani, Samaneh Adelian, Sahar Samsami, Neda Moradi, Nadi Rostami Ravari, Amirhossein Ahmadi, Michael R Hamblin, Amir Reza Aref.

Cancer cells must overcome a variety of external and internal stresses to survive and proliferate. These unfavorable conditions include the accumulation of mutations, nutrient deficiency, oxidative stress, and hypoxia. These stresses can cause aggregation of misfolded proteins inside the endoplasmic reticulum. Under these conditions, the cell undergoes endoplasmic reticulum stress (ER-stress), and consequently initiates the unfolded protein response (UPR). Activation of the UPR triggers transcription factors and regulatory factors, including long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), which control the gene expression profile to maintain cellular stability and hemostasis. Recent investigations have shown that cancer cells can ensure their survival under adverse conditions by the UPR affecting the expression of lncRNAs. Therefore, understanding the relationship between lncRNA expression and ER stress could open new avenues, and suggest potential therapies to treat various types of cancer.

Keywords: ER stress; cell survival; long noncoding RNAs; signaling pathways; unfolded protein response (UPR)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.30846

Cell Mol Life Sci. 2022 Aug 06. 79(9): 472

Unspliced XBP1 contributes to cholesterol biosynthesis and tumorigenesis by stabilizing SREBP2 in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Mankun Wei, Uli Nurjanah, Arin Herkilini, Can Huang, Yanjun Li, Makoto Miyagishi, Shourong Wu, Vivi Kasim.

Cholesterol biosynthesis plays a critical role in rapidly proliferating tumor cells. X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1), which was first characterized as a basic leucine zipper-type transcription factor, exists in an unspliced (XBP1-u) and spliced (XBP1-s) form. Recent studies showed that unspliced XBP1 (XBP1-u) has unique biological functions independent from XBP1-s and could promote tumorigenesis; however, whether it is involved in tumor metabolic reprogramming remains unknown. Herein, we found that XBP1-u promotes tumor growth by enhancing cholesterol biosynthesis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells. Specifically, XBP1-u colocalizes with sterol regulatory element-binding protein 2 (SREBP2) and inhibits its ubiquitination/proteasomal degradation. The ensuing stabilization of SREBP2 activates the transcription of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR), a rate-limiting enzyme in cholesterol biosynthesis. We subsequently show that the XBP1-u/SREBP2/HMGCR axis is crucial for enhancing cholesterol biosynthesis and lipid accumulation as well as tumorigenesis in HCC cells. Taken together, these findings reveal a novel function of XBP1-u in promoting tumorigenesis through increased cholesterol biosynthesis in hepatocarcinoma cells. Hence, XBP1-u might be a potential target for anti-tumor therapeutic strategies that focus on cholesterol metabolism in HCC.

Keywords: Cholesterol biosynthesis; SREBP2; Tumorigenesis; Unspliced XBP1 (XBP1-u); XBP1

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-022-04504-x