bims-hemali Biomed News
on Hematologic malignancies
Issue of 2026–05–10
fourteen papers selected by
Alexandros Alexandropoulos, Γενικό Νοσοκομείο Αθηνών Λαϊκό



  1. Leuk Res. 2026 Apr 30. pii: S0145-2126(26)00083-4. [Epub ahead of print]166 108239
       BACKGROUND: Asciminib is a first-in-class STAMP inhibitor used in treating patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP). Although its efficacy has been demonstrated in clinical trials, real-world data remain limited, particularly in heavily pretreated populations.
    METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study included patients with CML-CP from 25 centers in Turkey who received asciminib through a Managed Access Program. All patients had received at least two prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or harbored the T315I mutation. Early molecular response (EMR), major molecular response (MMR), and deep molecular response (DMR) were evaluated according to the ELN 2020 criteria.
    RESULTS: There were 49 patients with a median age of 61 years. Patients had a median of 4 prior TKIs, and resistance was the most common reason for switching (47%). Seven patients (14.2%) carried the T315I mutation. EMR at 3 months was achieved in 80% of evaluable patients, higher among those switched due to intolerance than to resistance (90% vs. 74%), and higher among ponatinib-pretreated than ponatinib-naïve patients (94% vs. 72%). Cumulative MMR and DMR rates were 32.6% and 37.2%, respectively. Higher response rates were observed in patients switched due to toxicities and in those previously treated with ponatinib. Among patients with the T315I mutation, 71.4% maintained or improved their response. Three patients died during follow-up. Asciminib 40 mg BID and 80 mg QD regimens seemed to be comparable regarding both efficacy and safety.
    CONCLUSION: In this real-world cohort, asciminib was well tolerated and provided meaningful responses in heavily pretreated CML-CP patients, consistent with the published data. Favorable outcomes in ponatinib-pretreated patients may partly reflect prior achievement of optimal response before switching due to limited access.
    Keywords:  Asciminib; CML; Chronic myeloid leukemia; Efficacy; Intolerance; Managed access program; Resistance; Safety; Tyrosine kinase inhibitor
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2026.108239
  2. Front Immunol. 2026 ;17 1809757
      The treatment landscape for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) has undergone a profound transformation over the past two decades. The integration of BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has shifted the paradigm from reliance on intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) towards targeted and immunotherapy-based strategies. Imatinib significantly improved initial complete remission (CR) rates and survival, enabling more patients to proceed to transplant. Second-generation and third-generation TKIs further improved outcomes by targeting most imatinib-resistant mutations, with ponatinib-based regimens achieving deep molecular responses and long-term survival in most patients. Concurrently, immunotherapies like blinatumomab and CAR-T cells have enabled potent chemotherapy-free strategies, yielding high molecular response rates and challenging the necessity of allo-HSCT for all patients. Current evidence supports reserving allo-HSCT for high-risk patients, while those with sustained minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity may be cured with TKI and immunotherapy alone. Future progress hinges on optimizing combinations, integrating novel agents like asciminib and venetoclax, and leveraging MRD and genomic profiling for precision medicine.
    Keywords:  Philadelphia chromosome; acute lymphoblastic leukemia; allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; immunotherapy; tyrosine kinase inhibitors
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1809757
  3. Ann Hematol. 2026 May 02. pii: 283. [Epub ahead of print]105(5):
      Ropeginterferon alfa-2b is an interferon used in the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms, particularly polycythemia vera. Its efficacy in achieving hematologic and molecular responses has been demonstrated in clinical trials, but pooled data on long-term outcomes and sustained response remain limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the hematologic and molecular response over 36 months. PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases were searched to identify studies reporting hematologic and molecular responses to ropeginterferon alfa-2b. Studies were included if they provided data on complete hematologic response (CHR) and JAK2V617F variant allele frequency (VAF) reduction. Pooled proportions and mean reductions were calculated using random-effects models. The pooled proportion of CHR increased progressively from 0.19 (95% CI: 0.04-0.57) at 3 months to 0.73 (95% CI: 0.17-0.97) at 36 months. Molecular response, measured by VAF reduction, deepened over time from - 7.33 (95% CI: -9.85 to -4.81) at 3 months to -54.90 (95% CI: -65.61 to -43.99) at 36 months. Subgroup analyses revealed significant variability in response rates, particularly in early follow-up periods. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b achieves significant and sustained hematologic and molecular responses over 36 months. This makes it a promising treatment for polycythemia vera. While variability in early responses needs further investigation, the sustained long-term efficacy compared to hydroxyurea supports its use in clinical practice. Future studies should focus on identifying predictors of response and optimizing treatment protocols to maximize patient outcomes.
    Keywords:  Complete hematologic response (CHR); JAK2V617F variant allele frequency (VAF); Meta-analysis; Molecular response; Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN); Polycythemia vera; Ropeginterferon alfa-2b
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-026-07005-0
  4. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2026 Jun;46(3): e517464
      The treatment of adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL (Ph+ ALL) has evolved significantly over the past 25 years. These changes have been driven largely by the development of potent BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as ponatinib, more accurate risk stratification and monitoring of measurable residual disease (MRD) and, most recently, the frontline use of blinatumomab-based, chemotherapy-free regimens. Although the historical standard of care for newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL was intensive chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in first remission, now most patients can achieve deep and durable remissions-and even cure-with a chemotherapy-free regimen, without the routine need for allo-HSCT. Although the role of allo-HSCT in first remission is diminishing in this new treatment landscape, allo-HSCT remains a reasonable consolidative option for patients with high-risk clinical or molecular features or in treatment settings where frontline blinatumomab and/or high-sensitivity MRD monitoring are not routinely available. With optimal frontline therapy and close disease monitoring, relapses of Ph+ ALL are increasingly uncommon but still pose a significant clinical challenge. Several new agents, including novel TKIs, bispecific antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies, are being evaluated in the relapsed/refractory setting and may eventually also play a role in frontline treatment of this disease.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK-26-517464
  5. Lancet Haematol. 2026 May;pii: S2352-3026(26)00037-2. [Epub ahead of print]13(5): e284-e296
       BACKGROUND: Covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have advanced the treatment of Waldenström macroglobulinaemia; however, the occurrence of progression, intolerance, and acquired resistance are not fully understood. We aim to report on the safety and activity of pirtobrutinib (a highly selective, non-covalent BTK inhibitor) in patients with relapsed or refractory Waldenström macroglobulinaemia, including those who received previous covalent BTK inhibitors as part of the phase 1/2 BRUIN trial.
    METHODS: The BRUIN study was an open-label, multicentre, phase 1/2 trial that enrolled patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies from 29 sites across eight countries. Patients aged 18 years or older who previously received BTK inhibitor-containing regimens, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and histologically confirmed Waldenström macroglobulinaemia were eligible. In phase 1, patients received 100-300 mg oral pirtobrutinib once a day in 28-day cycles and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 200 mg pirtobrutinib once a day was determined. The phase 2 primary endpoint was antitumour activity of pirtobrutinib based on objective response rate as assessed by an investigator in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, small lymphocytic leukaemia, or mantle cell lymphoma. In patients with Waldenström macroglobulinaemia, response was evaluated using the Sixth International Workshop on Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (IWWM-6) criteria. BRUIN is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03740529 (completed).
    FINDINGS: BRUIN recruited patients from Aug 12, 2019, to March 14, 2022, and 778 patients received pirtobrutinib. 80 patients had relapsed or refractory Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (n=18 in phase 1 and n=62 in phase 2), with a median age of 68·5 years (IQR 61·0-75·0). 52 (65%) patients were male and 28 (35%) were female. The median number of previous lines of systemic therapy was 3·0 (2·0-5·0). 63 (79%) patients received previous covalent BTK inhibitors. 73 (91%) received 200 mg pirtobrutinib once per day (the RP2D). Using IWWM-6 criteria, the objective response rate was 82·5% (95% CI 72·4-90·1), with one (1·3%) patient reaching complete response, eight (10·0%) reaching very good partial response, 49 (61·3%) reaching partial response, and eight (10·0%) reaching minor response. The median study follow-up was 35·0 months (17·7-47·7). The objective response rate was 81·0% (69·1-89·8) for those who received previous covalent BTK inhibitors and 88·2% (63·6-98·5) for covalent BTK inhibitor-naive patients. Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 57 (71%) patients, with the most common being neutropenia or neutrophil count decreased (15 [19%]) and anaemia (19 [24%]). Treatment-emergent deaths were reported in five (6%) patients (bacterial sepsis, intracranial haemorrhage, COVID-19 pneumonia, hypertensive cardiomegaly and pneumonia [n=1 each unrelated to treatment], and treatment-related necrotising pneumonia [n=1]). Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to dose reductions occurred in four (5%) patients and pirtobrutinib discontinuation in 12 (15%).
    INTERPRETATION: Pirtobrutinib was highly active and well tolerated, regardless of previous exposure to covalent BTK inhibitors, and might be a promising new therapeutic option for patients with relapsed or refractory Waldenström macroglobulinaemia, particularly in those previously exposed to covalent BTK inhibitors, for whom durable and effective treatments are needed.
    FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(26)00037-2
  6. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2026 May 04. pii: 162. [Epub ahead of print]75(6):
      Venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents (HMAs) is a standard therapy for older or unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, some patients exhibit suboptimal responses, potentially associated with T-cell exhaustion. Our preclinical findings that statins enhance HMA efficacy by boosting anti-tumor T-cell responses prompted us to translate this strategy to the clinic. A multicenter phase II clinical trial (ChiCTR 2500111931) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding rosuvastatin to venetoclax and azacitidine (venetoclax-azacitidine) in older/unfit AML patients. After induction therapy with this triple combination, the cohort achieved a complete response (CR) rate of 55.5% and a composite complete remission (CRc) rate of 72.2%. Among patients who achieved CRc, 84.6% attained measurable residual disease (MRD) < 10-3. With a median follow-up of 10 months, the median overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were 18 and 14 months, respectively. Although no significant changes in lipid profiles were observed, multiparametric flow cytometry revealed significant reductions in PD-1⁺CD4⁺ T cells (p = 0.0137) and PD-1⁺CD8⁺ T cells (p = 0.0277) after therapy. In vitro experiments revealed that the addition of rosuvastatin diminished both early (PD-1⁺TIM-3⁻) and terminally (PD-1⁺TIM-3⁺) exhausted T cells, suggesting it prevents the development of T-cell exhaustion induced by venetoclax-azacitidine. Furthermore, functional assays confirmed that rosuvastatin addition significantly enhanced T cell cytotoxicity against leukemia cells. Collectively, our findings suggest that adding rosuvastatin to venetoclax-azacitidine shows preliminary clinical activity and acceptable safety, possibly by reducing T-cell exhaustion, thus supporting further study of this triple regimen in older/unfit AML patients.
    Keywords:  Acute myeloid leukemia; Statins; T-cell exhaustion; Venetoclax-azacitidine
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-026-04397-w
  7. Lancet Haematol. 2026 May;pii: S2352-3026(26)00043-8. [Epub ahead of print]13(5): e315-e326
       BACKGROUND: Second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have improved response rates in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukaemia (CP-CML). Phase 2 trials demonstrated increased deep molecular response rates when combining second generation TKIs with pegylated interferon alfa (Peg-IFN). This trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of combining nilotinib with Peg-IFN alfa-2a in patients with newly diagnosed CP-CML.
    METHODS: In PETALs, this open-label, randomised, multicentre phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients with newly diagnosed CP-CML from 27 French academic institutions via a centrally-generated electronic system in a 1:1 ratio to two groups: 300 mg oral nilotinib alone twice a day (the nilotinib only group) or 300 mg nilotinib twice a day combined with subcutaneous Peg-IFN (30 μg per week for the first month of treatment and 45 μg per week thereafter) for a maximum of 2 years. The randomly allocated patients were stratified by their Sokal index and European Treatment and Outcome Study long-term survival index. Eligible patients had major BCR::ABL1 transcripts, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of two or lower, who had never received TKIs, and were aged between 18 and 65 years. The primary endpoint was the cumulative rate of molecular response 4·5 (MR4·5; defined as BCR::ABL1 international scale [IS] of 0·0032% and lower), analysed in the intention-to-treat population (n=200). This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02201459, and is completed.
    FINDINGS: 205 patients were enrolled between Aug 6, 2014, and Sept 29, 2016, after which five patients were declared ineligible and excluded, resulting in 200 patients being randomly allocated (99 to the nilotinib group and 101 to the combination group). The median age at diagnosis was 45 years (IQR 36-55); 130 patients (65%) were male and 70 (35%) were female. Median follow-up in this cohort was 67 months (IQR 32·6-70·6). The primary objective was met, with higher rates of MR4·5 in the combination group (24% [95% CI 16·0-34·1] vs 15% [8·6-24·2], p=0·048) at month 12. There were equivalent grade 3-4 haematological side effects in the both groups (14 vs 14) with a predominance for grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia without haemorrhages (six in the combination group vs five in the nilotinib group). Psychiatric grade 3-4 events occurred in six (6%) patients in the combination group (including three unsuccessful suicide attempts) compared with five (5%) in the nilotinib group (including one unsuccessful suicide attempt). Six vascular events also occurred in six patients in the combination group and seven vascular events in five patients in the nilotinib group (all grades 3-4).
    INTERPRETATION: In this setting, Peg-IFN combined with nilotinib induced higher initial rates of MR4·5 compared to TKI monotherapy, despite additional side effects. The onset of psychiatric events might promote immediate cease of Peg-IFN and psychiatrist advice Whether this early molecular response translates into sustained treatment-free survival should be studied in a randomised trial sufficiently powered for this outcome.
    FUNDING: Novartis Pharma.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(26)00043-8
  8. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2026 Jun;46(3): e517468
      Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a biologically and clinically heterogeneous B-cell malignancy with variable prognosis, ranging from indolent, asymptomatic forms to aggressive subtypes with early treatment failure. Contemporary management emphasizes risk-adapted strategies that integrate patient characteristics, clinical disease burden, and tumor biology. Prognostic tools such as the MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI) and its biologically integrated variant (combined MIPI), alongside assessment of Ki-67 proliferation, TP53 status, and blastoid morphology, help guide treatment selection. In younger, fit patients, first-line therapy traditionally involves dose-intensified chemoimmunotherapy with high-dose cytarabine and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). The incorporation of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), such as ibrutinib, into induction regimens has improved survival outcomes, with emerging evidence that may limit the use of ASCT to high-risk subsets. Maintenance therapy, particularly rituximab, remains crucial for durable disease control. In older or transplant-ineligible patients, bendamustine-rituximab remains a backbone therapy, with chemotherapy-free combinations incorporating BTKi, BCL2 inhibitors, and anti-CD20 antibodies offering effective, well-tolerated alternatives. High-risk patients, including those with TP53 mutations, may benefit from targeted triplet regimens or early cellular therapies. Relapsed/refractory MCL is increasingly managed with covalent and noncovalent BTKi, BCL2 inhibitors, and T-cell-redirecting therapies including chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies. Ongoing trials are evaluating optimal sequencing and combination strategies to improve outcomes, particularly in high-risk and cBTKi-exposed patients. Overall, modern MCL management emphasizes individualized therapy based on biological risk, functional status, and treatment tolerability, with novel targeted and cellular approaches reshaping the frontline and relapsed treatment landscape.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK-26-517468
  9. Cell Death Dis. 2026 May 05.
      BCR-ABL1, derived from structural chromosome rearrangements, is the driver mutation in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Targeting BCR-ABL1 for degradation is an ideal therapeutic strategy for CML, however, the regulatory mechanisms controlling BCR-ABL1 expression in CML remained unclear. Here, we identified PELI1 as a key regulator for maintaining BCR-ABL1 in CML. BCR-ABL1 upregulates PELI1 via the STAT5/FOXP3 pathway, and the increased PELI1 then interacts with and protects BCR-ABL1 from degradation in CML cells. Concurrently, PELI1 functions as a downstream effector to promote CML cell proliferation. Notably, genetic or pharmacological inhibition of PELI1 effectively suppresses the proliferation of both tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)-sensitive and TKI-resistant CML cells, as well as Leukemia stem cells (LSCs), which consequently ameliorates the disease burden and progression of CML. Collectively, our findings demonstrated that targeting PELI1 is a promising therapeutic strategy for CML that can overcome TKI resistance and eliminates LSCs.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-026-08799-7
  10. Blood Cancer J. 2026 May 07.
      BTK inhibitors (BTKi) have become standard of care for treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Covalent BTKi (cBTKi) such as ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and zanubrutinib are effective but alterations in the kinase domain at C481 or BTK gatekeeper residue T474 mutations result in development of resistance. Noncovalent BTK inhibitors (ncBTKi) such as pirtobrutinib are effective in patients with C481x mutations developed through use of cBTKi. However, resistance to ncBTKi can occur owing to second site aberrations in BTK, generating novel mutations such as L528x and T316x. Sometimes, CLL cells with double BTK mutations are also observed. These BTK aberrations underscore a need for new inhibitors that target pan-BTK-mutants. We evaluated the efficacy of a new ncBTKi, docirbrutinib (AS-1763), against 14 BTK mutants, including C481S, T474x, and L528x, as well as gatekeeper and kinase domain double mutants, using biochemical assays, cell-line models, and primary CLL lymphocytes. Docirbrutinib potently inhibited BTK autophosphorylation and mutant BTK-driven cell proliferation, with greater effects than ibrutinib and pirtobrutinib against certain mutants. In treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory CLL samples, docirbrutinib disrupted B-cell receptor signaling and sensitized cells to apoptosis induced by venetoclax and AZD5991. In a dose-escalation trial (NCT05602363), docirbrutinib decreased CCL3/CCL4 biomarkers and inhibited the B-cell receptor pathway signaling in longitudinal samples from patients with relapsed/refractory CLL. These findings establish docirbrutinib as a pan-mutant ncBTKi with potential to improve outcomes for CLL patients, including those with disease resistant to cBTKi and other ncBTKi.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-026-01509-8
  11. Ann Hematol. 2026 May 09.
       BACKGROUND: Oral azacitidine improves survival in patients with AML in first complete remission who are not candidates for allogeneic transplantation. Most favorable-risk AML patients harbor molecular markers enabling sensitive measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring. While MRD is a well-established prognostic factor in AML, the clinical significance of MRD dynamics during maintenance therapy remains incompletely defined.
    METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, real-world retrospective study of 30 patients with AML, predominantly ELN favorable-risk, treated with oral azacitidine maintenance following intensive induction-consolidation. MRD was assessed longitudinally using standardized molecular and flow-based assays. Outcomes were analyzed according to MRD status at maintenance initiation and subsequent MRD conversion.
    RESULTS: At initiation of oral azacitidine, 47% of patients were MRD-positive. MRD conversion to negativity occurred in 64% of these patients during maintenance. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was comparable between patients who were MRD-negative at baseline and those who converted to MRD negativity (24-months restricted median RFS 577 vs. 638 days), whereas patients with persistent MRD positivity experienced early relapse (24-months restricted median RFS 63 days). Despite inferior RFS, overall survival did not significantly differ between MRD-defined groups. Patients relapsing after oral azacitidine retained sensitivity to subsequent therapies, including venetoclax-azacitidine-based regimens, with high rates of molecular response.
    CONCLUSIONS: Oral azacitidine was associated with high rates of MRD conversion, conferring RFS comparable to patients who were MRD-negative at treatment initiation. Persistent MRD identified patients at high-risk for early relapse, while effective salvage therapies mitigated overall survival differences. These findings support prospective evaluation of MRD-guided maintenance strategies in favorable-risk AML but should be considered hypothesis-generating given the retrospective design and limited cohort size. The trial is on behalf of the Israel Acute Leukemia Group.
    Keywords:  Acute myeloid leukemia; Maintenance; Measurable residual disease; Onureg; Oral azacitidine
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-026-07054-5
  12. Clin Transl Med. 2026 May;16(5): e70676
       BACKGROUND: Exportin-1 (XPO1), a key regulator of nucleocytoplasmic transport, is frequently dysregulated in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and contributes to leukemogenesis, disease progression and therapeutic resistance. Selective inhibitors of nuclear export (SINEs), especially selinexor and eltanexor, have shown promising antileukemic potential. However, their clinical value, optimal therapeutic positioning and rational use in AML remain to be fully clarified.
    METHODS: We collected and reviewed relevant literature to summarize the biological roles of XPO1 in AML and the therapeutic potential of XPO1 inhibitors in preclinical and clinical settings.
    RESULTS: In this review, we focus on the nuclear export function of XPO1 and its pathogenic role in AML. We summarize the mechanisms of action, preclinical evidence, clinical trial results, adverse effects, resistance mechanisms and potential response biomarkers associated with XPO1 inhibitors in AML.
    CONCLUSIONS: XPO1 inhibition has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy for AML, offering a novel approach to targeting aberrant nucleocytoplasmic transport and overcoming treatment resistance. Future studies should focus on optimizing dosing schedules, identifying predictive biomarkers and developing effective combination strategies in molecularly selected AML populations.
    KEY POINTS: XPO1 hyperactivation rewires nucleocytoplasmic transport and sustains leukaemogenic programs in genetically defined acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) subsets. Selective XPO1 inhibitors (selinexor, eltanexor) show preferential activity in NPM1-mutated, DEK::NUP214-positive and SF3B1-mutated myeloid neoplasms. Combination strategies with hypomethylating agents, BCL-2 inhibitors and other targeted therapies enhance depth and durability of responses but are limited by toxicity. Future clinical trials should focus on molecularly selected populations, biomarker-guided dosing and translational endpoints such as measurable residual disease (MRD) and clonal dynamics.
    Keywords:  XPO1 inhibition; acute myeloid leukaemia; exportin‐1; selective inhibitors of nuclear export; venetoclax‐based combinations
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1002/ctm2.70676