bims-librar Biomed News
on Biomedical librarianship
Issue of 2023–05–28
eightteen papers selected by
Thomas Krichel, Open Library Society



  1. Health Promot Pract. 2023 May 24. 15248399231176252
      The COVID-19 pandemic made it difficult for Native American populations to access health information. Through funding from the Network of The National Library of Medicine Region 4, a community library was able to enhance their native and nonnative health collections for distribution on the Wind River Reservation in Central Wyoming. The book mobile was originally funded by the Wyoming State Library through American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 funding to increase literacy efforts during the pandemic. Materials were distributed at multiple locations throughout the reservation and individuals indicated they appreciated the materials being provided. This program was successful in distributing health information to an underserved priority population within the United States. Hopefully, similar programs would be successful in enhancing health education programs with other priority populations in both the United States and the world.
    Keywords:  college/community partnerships; health education; health literacy; health promotion; university/college health
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399231176252
  2. J Consum Health Internet. 2022 ;26(1): 109-118
      An academic medical center library and community outreach office partnered with community-based organizations and public libraries to deliver patient empowerment workshops within the community. The workshops included information on reliable sources for health information and how to engage your medical provider as a partner in improving your health. The initial project expanded to include the creation of professional development workshops for area public librarians. The final stage of the project was the redesign of the academic library's website page to incorporate the community workshop content, including the creation of patient_education videos.
    Keywords:  community engagement; community outreach; community partnerships; community workshops; community-based organizations; educational videos; health information; libraries; patient empowerment; physician-patient communication; professional development
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1080/15398285.2022.2030143
  3. BMC Prim Care. 2023 May 25. 24(1): 118
       BACKGROUND: Due to the nature of their work, general practitioners (GPs) need to be up to date with evidence in various medical domains. While much synthesised research evidence is easily accessible nowadays, in practice, the time to search for and review this evidence proposes a challenge. In German primary care, the knowledge infrastructure is rather fragmented, leaving GPs with relatively few primary care specific resources of information and many resources from other medical fields. This study aimed to explore GPs information-seeking behaviour regarding evidence-based recommendations in cardiovascular care in Germany.
    METHODS: To explore views of GPs a qualitative research design was chosen. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews. In total, 27 telephone interviews with GPs were conducted between June and November 2021.Verbatim transcript interviews were then analysed using thematic analysis, deriving at themes inductively.
    RESULTS: Two broad strategies of information-seeking behaviour in GP could be distinguished: (a) generic information-seeking behaviour and (b) casuistic information-seeking. The first referring to strategies GPs apply to keep up with medical developments such as new medication and the second referring to purposeful information exchange regarding individual patients, such as referral letters. The second strategy was also used to keep up with medical developments in general.
    CONCLUSION: In a fragmented information landscape, GPs used information exchange on individual patients to remain informed about medical developments in general. Initiatives to implement recommended practices need to take this into account, either by using these sources of influence or by making GPs aware of possible bias and risks. The findings also emphasize the importance of systematic evidence-based sources of information for GPs.
    TRAIL REGISTRATION: We registered the study prospectively on 07/11/2019 at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS, www.drks.de ) under ID no. DRKS00019219.
    Keywords:  Ambulatory cardiology care; Cardiovascular diseases; Coordination of care; Germany; Information behaviour; Information practice; Information-seeking behaviour; Primary care; Qualitative interviews
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02069-7
  4. Front Res Metr Anal. 2023 ;8 1149834
      Classifying scientific publications according to Field-of-Science taxonomies is of crucial importance, powering a wealth of relevant applications including Search Engines, Tools for Scientific Literature, Recommendation Systems, and Science Monitoring. Furthermore, it allows funders, publishers, scholars, companies, and other stakeholders to organize scientific literature more effectively, calculate impact indicators along Science Impact pathways and identify emerging topics that can also facilitate Science, Technology, and Innovation policy-making. As a result, existing classification schemes for scientific publications underpin a large area of research evaluation with several classification schemes currently in use. However, many existing schemes are domain-specific, comprised of few levels of granularity, and require continuous manual work, making it hard to follow the rapidly evolving landscape of science as new research topics emerge. Based on our previous work of scinobo, which incorporates metadata and graph-based publication bibliometric information to assign Field-of-Science fields to scientific publications, we propose a novel hybrid approach by further employing Neural Topic Modeling and Community Detection techniques to dynamically construct a Field-of-Science taxonomy used as the backbone in automatic publication-level Field-of-Science classifiers. Our proposed Field-of-Science taxonomy is based on the OECD fields of research and development (FORD) classification, developed in the framework of the Frascati Manual containing knowledge domains in broad (first level(L1), one-digit) and narrower (second level(L2), two-digit) levels. We create a 3-level hierarchical taxonomy by manually linking Field-of-Science fields of the sciencemetrix Journal classification to the OECD/FORD level-2 fields. To facilitate a more fine-grained analysis, we extend the aforementioned Field-of-Science taxonomy to level-4 and level-5 fields by employing a pipeline of AI techniques. We evaluate the coherence and the coverage of the Field-of-Science fields for the two additional levels based on synthesis scientific publications in two case studies, in the knowledge domains of Energy and Artificial Intelligence. Our results showcase that the proposed automatically generated Field-of-Science taxonomy captures the dynamics of the two research areas encompassing the underlying structure and the emerging scientific developments.
    Keywords:  Field of Science taxonomy; digital libraries; field of science publication classification; multilayer network; natural language processing; scholarly literature
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1149834
  5. Fam Med Community Health. 2023 May;pii: e002090. [Epub ahead of print]11(2):
      Universal access to health information is a human right and essential to achieving universal health coverage and the other health-related targets of the sustainable development goals. The COVID-19 pandemic has further highlighted the importance of trustworthy sources of health information that are accessible to all people, easily understood and acted on. WHO has developed Your life, your health: Tips and information for health and wellbeing, as a new digital resource for the general public which makes trustworthy health information understandable, accessible and actionable. It provides basic information on important topics, skills and rights related to health and well-being. For those who want to learn more, in-depth information can be accessed through links to WHO videos, infographics and fact sheets. Towards ensuring access to universal health information, this resource was developed using a structured method to: (1) synthesise evidence-based guidance, prioritising public-oriented content, including related rights and skills; (2) develop messages and graphics to be accessible, understandable and actionable for all people based on health literacy principles; (3) engage with experts and other stakeholders to refine messages and message delivery; (4) build a digital resource and test content to obtain feedback from a range of potential users and (5) adapt and co-develop the resource based on feedback and new evidence going forward. As with all WHO global information resources, Your life, your health can be adapted to different contexts. We invite feedback on how the resource can be used, refined and further co-developed to meet people's health information needs.
    Keywords:  Health Literacy; Healthy People Programs; Public Health
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2022-002090
  6. Recenti Prog Med. 2023 Jun;114(6): 359-361
      Systematic reviews (SRs) are essential tools for synthesising the available scientific evidence on a given topic, and in some healthcare fields they represent the core for public health decisions according to the principles of evidence-based medicine. However, keeping up to date with the volume of scientific production is not always easy given the estimated annual increase in scientific publications of 4.10%. Indeed, SRs take a long time, with an average time of eleven months from design to submission to a scientific journal; to make more efficient this process and timely achieve evidence collection, systems such as living systematic reviews and artificial intelligence tools have been developed for the automation of SRs. These tools can be divided into three categories: visualisation tools, active learning tools and automated tools with Natural Language Processing (NLP). Nlp makes it possible to reduce the time spent and human error, for example, in the screening of primary studies; there are already many tools that apply to all stages of a SR, currently the most widely used are those with "human-in-the-loop" where the reviewer is involved in the various steps to verify the goodness of the work performed by the model. At this time of transition in SRs, new approaches are emerging and are increasingly appreciated by the community of reviewers; leaving some more basic but also error-prone tasks to machine learning tools can increase the efficiency of the reviewer and the overall quality of the review itself.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1701/4042.40229
  7. Res Synth Methods. 2023 May 25.
      The laborious and time-consuming nature of systematic review production hinders the dissemination of up-to-date evidence synthesis. Well-performing natural language processing (NLP) tools for systematic reviews have been developed, showing promise to improve efficiency. However, the feasibility and value of these technologies have not been comprehensively demonstrated in a real-world review. We developed an NLP-assisted abstract screening tool that provides text inclusion recommendations, keyword highlights, and visual context cues. We evaluated this tool in a living systematic review on SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence, conducting a quality improvement assessment of screening with and without the tool. We evaluated changes to abstract screening speed, screening accuracy, characteristics of included texts, and user satisfaction. The tool improved efficiency, reducing screening time per abstract by 45.9% and decreasing inter-reviewer conflict rates. The tool conserved precision of article inclusion (positive predictive value; 0.92 with tool vs. 0.88 without) and recall (sensitivity; 0.90 vs. 0.81). The summary statistics of included studies were similar with and without the tool. Users were satisfied with the tool (mean satisfaction score of 4.2/5). We evaluated an abstract screening process where one human reviewer was replaced with the tool's votes, finding that this maintained recall (0.92 one-person, one-tool vs. 0.90 two tool-assisted humans) and precision (0.91 vs. 0.92) while reducing screening time by 70%. Implementing an NLP tool in this living systematic review improved efficiency, maintained accuracy, and was well-received by researchers, demonstrating the real-world effectiveness of NLP in expediting evidence synthesis.
    Keywords:  abstract screening; living literature review; natural language processing; systematic review; text classification
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1636
  8. Int J Rheum Dis. 2023 May 23.
       AIM: It is inevitable that artificial intelligence applications will be used as a source of information in the field of health in the near future. For this reason, we aimed to evaluate whether ChatGPT, a new Large Language Model, can be used to obtain information about common rheumatic diseases.
    MATERIALS AND METHODS: Common rheumatic diseases were identified using the American College of Rheumatology and European League against Rheumatism guidelines. Osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis (AS), systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriatic arthritis, fibromyalgia syndrome, and gout were identified by using Google trends for the four most frequently searched keywords on Google. The responses were evaluated with seven-point Likert-type reliability and usefulness scales developed by us.
    RESULTS: The highest score in terms of reliability was OA (mean ± standard deviation 5.62 ± 1.17), whereas the highest score in terms of usefulness was AS (mean 5.87 ± 0.17). There was no significant difference in the reliability and usefulness of the answers given by the ChatGPT (p = .423 and p = .387, respectively). All scores ranged between 4 and 7.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although ChatGPT is reliable and useful for patients to obtain information about rheumatic diseases, it should be kept in mind that it may give false and misleading answers.
    Keywords:  ChatGPT; artificial intelligence; chatbot; large language model; rheumatic diseases
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.14749
  9. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 May 19. pii: 429. [Epub ahead of print]13(5):
      Parents commonly seek information about infant development and play, yet it is unclear what information parents find when looking in popular sources. Play, Milestone, and Development Searches in Google identified 313 sources for content analysis by trained researchers using a standardized coding scheme. Sources included websites, books, and apps created by professional organizations, commercial entities, individuals, the popular press, and government organizations/agencies. The results showed that for popular sources: (1) author information (i.e., qualifications, credentials, education/experience) is not consistently provided, nor is information about the developmental process, parents' role in development, or determining an infant's readiness to play; (2) milestones comprise a majority of the content overall; (3) search terminology impacts the information parents receive; (4) sources from the Milestone and Development Searches emphasized a passive approach of observing developmental milestones rather than suggesting activities to actively facilitate learning and milestone development. These findings highlight the need to discuss parents' online information-gathering process and findings. They also highlight the need for innovative universal parent-education programs that focus on activities to facilitate early development. This type of education has potential to benefit all families, with particular benefits for families with children who have unidentified or untreated developmental delays.
    Keywords:  child development; content analysis; health education; infancy; information seeking; internet; milestones; parenting practices; play and playthings
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13050429
  10. PEC Innov. 2022 Dec;1 100103
       Objective: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most common cardiovascular disease worldwide. However, public awareness is considerably lower than for myocardial infarction or stroke. Patients suffering from PE complain about the lack of (understandable) information and express high informational needs. To uncover if reliable information is indeed scarce, this study evaluates the quantity and quality of existing patient information for tertiary prevention using an evidence-based health information paradigm.
    Methods: We conducted a quantitative content analysis (n = 21 patient information brochures; n = 67 websites) evaluating content categories addressed, methodical quality, usability, and readability.
    Results: Results show that there is not enough patient information material focusing on PE as a main topic. Existing patient information material is mostly incomplete, difficult to understand, and low in actionability as well as readability.
    Conclusion: Our systematic analysis reveals the need for more high-quality patient information on PE as part of effective tertiary prevention.
    Innovation: This is the first review analyzing content, methodical quality, readability, and usability of patient information on PE. The findings of this analysis are guiding the development of an innovative, evidence-based patient information on PE aiming to support patients' informational needs and their self-care behavior.
    Keywords:  Health information; Informed decision making; Patient information; Patient information brochures; Pulmonary embolism
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100103
  11. J Oral Rehabil. 2023 May 26.
       OBJECTIVE: Bruxism patients often access the web to search for information. Unfortunately, the low text readability of online material and the limited medical literacy in the general population may prevent patients' understanding of health information. We aimed to assess the home page's readability of the top 10 patients-oriented bruxism-related websites and the educational level required to approach them.
    MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the word bruxism in the "no country redirect" extension of Google Chrome browser (www.google.com/ncr), we identified the first 10 patient-oriented English language websites. The readability of the material was determined using six commonly recommended readability tests (1): Gunning Fog Index (GFI), Coleman Liau Index (CLI), Automated Readability Index (ARI) Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Flesch Kincald Grade Level (FKGL), Flesh Reasing Ease (FRE).
    RESULTS: The USA National Institutes of Health requirements, which call for websites to be readable at a 6th to 7th-grade level, were not followed by any of the most popular websites.
    CONCLUSION: The average consumer frequently finds the health information on the Internet to be too complex to understand, which can lead to misinterpretation, a delay in diagnosis, and poorer health consequences.
    Keywords:  TMD; bruxism; e-Health; readability; temporomandibular disorder
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13519
  12. J Cutan Med Surg. 2023 May 24. 12034754231174847
      
    Keywords:  DISCERN; Skin cancer; YouTube; assessment; basal cell carcinoma; internet; melanoma; patient education; quality; skin of color; social media; squamous cell carcinoma
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1177/12034754231174847
  13. Cureus. 2023 Apr;15(4): e38047
      Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic and painful skin condition that is difficult to treat. Patients commonly navigate YouTube's platform for insight into different treatment options; thus, we analyzed the content and quality of the top 100 HS videos to assess which treatment options were most favored. Our study indicated a growing number of informational videos on the platform over 10 years, with the majority of the content from the United States. Surgical videos had higher view counts than nonsurgical ones, even though the level of engagement measured by likes and comments was similar between the two. There were no differences in the presented tone between the two categories. Overall, YouTube videos have a moderate quality with no serious shortcomings based on a previously validated DISCERN instrument score. Healthcare professionals treating HS patients should continue to direct patients to evidenced-based sources of reliable information on their condition.
    Keywords:  dermatology; dermatology surgery; hidradenitis suppurativa; skin condition; social media study
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38047
  14. J Craniofac Surg. 2023 May 25.
      Although many studies have evaluated the quality of YouTube videos related to dentistry, just one study has evaluated the quality of YouTube videos related to peri-implantitis. The aim of the cross-sectional study was to evaluate the quality of peri-implantitis-related YouTube videos. Two periodontists evaluated 47 videos that met the inclusion criteria, such as the country of upload, source of videos, number of views, likes and dislikes, viewing rate, interaction index, number of days since upload, duration of the video, usefulness score, global quality scale score, and comments. Peri-implantitis was evaluated using a 7-question system of the videos, 44.7% and 55.3% were uploaded by commercial companies and health care professionals, respectively. Although the usefulness score of the videos uploaded by health care professionals was statistically significantly higher (P=0.022), the number of views, numbers of likes and dislikes were similar between the groups (P>0.050). Although the usefulness score and global quality scale score of the perfect videos were statistically different between the groups (P<0.001; P<0.001, respectively), the number of views, numbers of likes, and dislikes were similar. A strong positive correlation was found between the number of views and the number of likes (P˂0.001). A strong negative correlation was found between the interaction index and the number of days since upload (P˂0.001). As a result, YouTube videos on peri-implantitis were limited in number and had poor quality. Thus, videos of perfect quality should be uploaded.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000009392
  15. Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 May 17. pii: S1471-5953(23)00131-2. [Epub ahead of print]70 103669
       AIM: This study was conducted to evaluate the content, reliability and quality of YouTube videos about phlebotomy.
    METHOD: A retrospective, register-based study was conducted exclusively with videos publicly available on YouTube in June 2022. Ninety videos have been evaluated in terms of content, reliability and quality. This evaluation was performed by two independent researchers. The skill checklist created with reference to the WHO blood collection guide was used for the content evaluation of the videos. The short form of the DISCERN questionnaire was used to evaluate the reliability of the video. The quality of the videos was evaluated with a 5-point Global Quality Scale.
    RESULTS: The mean validity score of the English videos was 2.58 ± 0.88, the quality score was 2.98 ± 1.02 and the content score was 8.78 ± 1.47. In the Turkish videos, the mean validity score was 1.90 ± 1.27, the quality score was 2.35 ± 0.97 and the content score was 8.02 ± 1.07. The content, validity and quality scores of the English videos were found to be significantly higher than the Turkish videos.
    CONCLUSION: Some videos do not include evidence-based practice and some videos contain technical differences as in the literature. In addition, in some videos, non-recommended techniques such as touching the cleaning area, opening and closing the fist were used. For these reasons, the results show that YouTube videos on phlebotomy are a limited resource for students.
    Keywords:  Blood collection; Clinical skills; Phlebotomy; Video; YouTube
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103669
  16. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2023 Mar-Apr;13(2):13(2): 133-140
       Objectives: This study aims to explore the information-seeking behavior patterns of parents with children receiving treatment for early childhood caries (ECC).
    Materials and Methods: Semistructured in-depth interviews were conducted with 20 parents of children with ECC. A topic guide was developed, focusing on questions relating to (i) the timing of their seeking information on ECC, (ii) the types of EEC information they seek, and (iii) the resources used to seek information. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was performed, whereby the data were coded and categorized into themes and subthemes.
    Results: Four main themes were identified: the immediacy of seeking information, perceived information need, use of resources, and barriers to seeking information. Parents either sought information immediately after detecting changes to the appearance of their child's teeth, with some being aware of the changes after signs and symptoms developed. The types of information parents usually sought covered the disease, its prevention, and management. Common sources of information were friends, family, the internet, and healthcare professionals. Barriers to seeking information discussed by parents were lack of time as well as insufficiency and inaccuracy of the information they received.
    Conclusion: This study highlighted the need for comprehensive, tailored early education on ECC for parents using reliable information sources. There is also a need to empower other nondental healthcare professionals to provide oral healthcare education for parents.
    Keywords:  Dental care for children; early childhood caries; information-seeking behavior; parents; qualitative research
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_213_22
  17. N Am Spine Soc J. 2023 Jun;14 100214
       Background: Google's People Also Ask feature uses various machine learning algorithms to distill the most frequently asked questions and link users to potential answers. The aim of this study is to investigate the most frequently asked questions related to commonly performed spine surgeries.
    Methods: This is an observational study utilizing Google's People Also Ask feature. A variety of search terms were entered into Google for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), discectomy, and lumbar fusion. Frequently asked questions and linked websites were extracted. Questions were categorized by topic based on Rothwell's Classification system, and websites were categorized by type. Pearson's chi-squared and Student t tests were performed as appropriate.
    Results: A total of 576 unique questions (181 ACDF, 148 discectomy, 309 lumbar fusion) were extracted with 372 unique websites and 177 domains. The most common website types were medical practice (41%), social media (22%), and academic (15%). The most popular question topics were specific activities & restrictions (22%), technical details (23%), and evaluation of surgery (17%). Questions related to technical details were more common in discectomy vs lumbar fusion (33% vs 24%, p=.03) and lumbar fusion vs ACDF (24% vs 14%, p=.01). Questions related to specific activities & restrictions were more common in ACDF vs discectomy (17% vs 8%, p=.02) and ACDF vs lumbar fusion (28% vs 19%, p=.016). Questions related to risks & complications were more common in ACDF vs lumbar fusion (10% vs 4%, p=.01).
    Conclusions: The most frequently asked questions on Google regarding spine surgery are related to technical details and activity restrictions. Surgeons may emphasize these domains in consultations and direct patients to reputable sources of further information. Much of the linked information provided originates from nonacademic and nongovernment sources (72%), with 22% from social media websites.
    Keywords:  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; Discectomy; Lumbar fusion; Machine learning; Natural language processing; Online health information; Patient education; Search analytics; Social media; Spinal fusion
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100214