bims-lifras 2023-11-12 papers

JAMA Oncol. 2023 Nov 04.

Diagnostic Outcomes of Concurrent DNA and RNA Sequencing in Individuals Undergoing Hereditary Cancer Testing.

Carolyn Horton, Lily Hoang, Heather Zimmermann, Colin Young, Jessica Grzybowski, Kate Durda, Huy Vuong, David Burks, Ashley Cass, Holly LaDuca, Marcy E Richardson, Steven Harrison, Elizabeth C Chao, Rachid Karam.

Importance: Personalized surveillance, prophylaxis, and cancer treatment options for individuals with hereditary cancer predisposition are informed by results of germline genetic testing. Improvements to genomic technology, such as the availability of RNA sequencing, may increase identification of individuals eligible for personalized interventions by improving the accuracy and yield of germline testing.
Objective: To assess the cumulative association of paired DNA and RNA testing with detection of disease-causing germline genetic variants and resolution of variants of uncertain significance (VUS).
Design, Setting, and Participants: Paired DNA and RNA sequencing was performed on individuals undergoing germline testing for hereditary cancer indication at a single diagnostic laboratory from March 2019 through April 2020. Demographic characteristics, clinical data, and test results were curated as samples were received, and changes to variant classification were assessed over time. Data analysis was performed from May 2020 to June 2023.
Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes were increase in diagnostic yield, decrease in VUS rate, the overall results by variant type, the association of RNA evidence with variant classification, and the corresponding predicted effect on cancer risk management.
Results: A total of 43 524 individuals were included (median [range] age at testing, 54 [2-101] years; 37 373 female individuals [85.7%], 6224 male individuals [14.3%], and 2 individuals of unknown sex [<0.1%]), with 43 599 tests. A total of 2197 (5.0%) were Ashkenazi Jewish, 1539 (3.5%) were Asian, 3077 (7.1%) were Black, 2437 (5.6%) were Hispanic, 27 793 (63.7%) were White, and 2049 (4.7%) were other race, and for 4507 individuals (10.3%), race and ethnicity were unknown. Variant classification was impacted in 549 individuals (1.3%). Medically significant upgrades were made in 97 individuals, including 70 individuals who had a variant reclassified from VUS to pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) and 27 individuals who had a novel deep intronic P/LP variant that would not have been detected using DNA sequencing alone. A total of 93 of 545 P/LP splicing variants (17.1%) were dependent on RNA evidence for classification, and 312 of 439 existing splicing VUS (71.1%) were resolved by RNA evidence. Notably, the increase in positive rate (3.1%) and decrease in VUS rate (-3.9%) was higher in Asian, Black, and Hispanic individuals combined compared to White individuals (1.6%; P = .02; and -2.5%; P < .001).
Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this diagnostic study demonstrate that the ability to perform RNA sequencing concurrently with DNA sequencing represents an important advancement in germline genetic testing by improving detection of novel variants and classification of existing variants. This expands the identification of individuals with hereditary cancer predisposition and increases opportunities for personalization of therapeutics and surveillance.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.5586

Cancer Med. 2023 Nov 06.

Pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1 and TP53 increase lung cancer risk in Chinese.

Bing Wei, Jiadong Zhao, Jun Li, Junnan Feng, Manman Sun, Zhizhong Wang, Chao Shi, Ke Yang, Yue Qin, Jing Zhang, Jie Ma, Hui Dong.

BACKGROUD: Multiple studies have identified pathogenic germline variants in cancer susceptibility genes (CSGs) in Chinese lung cancer patients; however, accurate assessment of these variants' contributions to cancer predisposition is always hampered by the absence of data on the prevalence of these variants in the general population. It is necessary to conduct a large-scale case-control study to identify CSGs that significantly increase the risk of lung cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed targeted sequencing of a CSGs panel in 1117 lung cancer patients and 16,327 controls from the general Chinese population.
RESULTS: In comparison to controls, lung cancer patients had a considerably higher prevalence of pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variations. Among lung cancer patients, 72% of P/LP variants carriers did not have a family cancer history, who would be ignored if germline testing was only provided for patients meeting family history-based criteria. Furthermore, compared to individuals with late-onset lung cancer, patients with early-onset lung cancer had a considerably higher prevalence of P/LP variations. With odds ratios (ORs) ranging from 4-fold (BRCA1: OR, 4.193; 95%CI, 1.382-10.768) to 29-fold (TP53: OR, 29.281; 95%CI, 1.523-1705.506), P/LP variants in the BRCA1 and TP53 genes were discovered to be strongly related to increased lung cancer risk. Additionally, with ORs ranging from 7.322-fold to infinity, we discovered 23 variations previously categorized as non-P/LP variants were highly enriched in lung cancer patients.
CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated that P/LP variants in BRCA1 and TP53 conferred increased risk of lung cancer in Chinese.

Keywords: BRCA1 ; TP53 ; Chinese; germline variants; lung cancer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6692

J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023 11;21(11): 1156-1163.e5

Referral, Uptake, and Outcome of Genetic Counseling and Testing in Patients With Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.

Hareem Syed, Joshua Sommovilla, Carol A Burke, Sarah McGee, Carole Macaron, Brandie Heald, Ruishen Lyu, Stephanie L Schmit, Kanika Nair, Suneel Kamath, Smitha Krishnamurthi, Alok A Khorana, David Liska.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is rapidly increasing. Pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) are detected in 16% to 20% of patients who have EOCRC, highlighting a need for genetic counseling (GC) and multigene panel testing in these patients. We aimed to determine the rate of referral to GC and uptake and outcomes of germline testing in patients with EOCRC.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients aged <50 years diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) from 2010 to 2019 at Cleveland Clinic. Demographic data were extracted, including age, sex, self-reported race, and family history of CRC. The proportions of patients with GC referral and completion of GC and genetic testing were investigated, and genetic testing results were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors independently associated with GC referral and uptake.
RESULTS: A total of 791 patients with EOCRC (57% male and 43% female) were included; 62% were referred for GC, and of those who were referred, 79% completed a GC appointment and 77% underwent genetic testing. Of those who underwent testing, 21% had a PGV detected; 82% were in known CRC-associated genes, with those associated with Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis the most common, and 11% were in other actionable genes. Referral to GC was positively associated with family history of CRC (odds ratio [OR], 2.11; 95% CI, 1.51-2.96) and more recent year of diagnosis (2010-2013 vs 2017-2019; OR, 5.36; 95% CI, 3.59-8.01) but negatively associated with older age at diagnosis (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86-0.92).
CONCLUSIONS: Referral to GC for patients with EOCRC is increasing over time; however, even in recent years, almost 25% of patients were not referred for GC. We found that 1 in 5 patients with EOCRC carry actionable PGVs, highlighting the need for health systems to implement care pathways to optimize GC referral and testing in all patients with EOCRC.

Keywords: early-onset colorectal cancer; genetic counseling; genetic testing; hereditary colorectal cancer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2023.7057

Sci Rep. 2023 11 06. 13(1): 19135

Impact of germline DNA repair gene variants on prognosis and treatment of men with advanced prostate cancer.

Emma B Hansen, Questa Karlsson, Susan Merson, Sarah Wakerell, Reshma Rageevakumar, Jørgen B Jensen, Michael Borre, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Rosalind A Eeles, Karina D Sørensen.

The clinical importance of germline variants in DNA repair genes (DRGs) is becoming increasingly recognized, but their impact on advanced prostate cancer prognosis remains unclear. A cohort of 221 newly diagnosed metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients were screened for pathogenic germline variants in 114 DRGs. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) on first-line androgen signaling inhibitor (ARSI) treatment for mCRPC. Secondary endpoints were time to mCRPC progression on initial androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and overall survival (OS). Twenty-seven patients (12.2%) carried a germline DRG variant. DRG carrier status was independently associated with shorter PFS on first-line ARSI [HR 1.72 (1.06-2.81), P = 0.029]. At initiation of ADT, DRG carrier status was independently associated with shorter progression time to mCRPC [HR 1.56, (1.02-2.39), P = 0.04] and shorter OS [HR 1.99, (1.12-3.52), P = 0.02]. Investigating the contributions of individual germline DRG variants on PFS and OS revealed CHEK2 variants to have little effect. Furthermore, prior taxane treatment was associated with worse PFS on first-line ARSI for DRG carriers excluding CHEK2 (P = 0.0001), but not for noncarriers. In conclusion, germline DRG carrier status holds independent prognostic value for predicting advanced prostate cancer patient outcomes and may potentially inform on optimal treatment sequencing already at the hormone-sensitive stage.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46323-5

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023 Nov 08. pii: ijgc-2023-004815. [Epub ahead of print]

Comprehensive molecular assessment of mismatch repair deficiency in Lynch associated ovarian cancers using next generation sequencing panel.

Soyoun Rachel Kim, Leslie Oldfield, Alicia Tone, Aaron Pollett, Stephanie Pedersen, Johanna Wellum, Matthew Cesari, Katherine Lajkosz, Trevor J Pugh, Sarah Elizabeth Ferguson.

OBJECTIVES: Abnormalities in mismatch repair have been described in ovarian cancer, but few studies have examined the causes of mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd). To address this, we completed targeted mutational and methylation sequencing on MMRd ovarian cancer cases. The objective of this study was to explore the molecular mechanism of MMRd using our targeted next generation sequencing panel.
METHODS: Newly diagnosed non-serous/mucinous ovarian cancers (n=215) were prospectively recruited from three cancer centers in Ontario, Canada, between 2015 and 2018. Tumors were reflexively assessed for mismatch repair protein by immunohistochemistry. Matched tumor-normal MMRd cases were analyzed on a custom next generation sequencing panel to identify germline and somatic mutations, copy number variants, rearrangements, and promoter methylation in mismatch repair and associated genes.
RESULTS: Of 215 cases, 28 (13%) were MMRd. The MMRd cohort had a median age of 52.3 years (range 33.6-62.2), with mostly stage I (50%) and grade 1 or 2 endometrioid histotype (57%). Of the 28 cases, 22 were available for molecular analysis, and Lynch syndrome was detected in 50% of MMRd cases (11/22; seven ovarian cancer and four synchronous ovarian and endometrial cancer: seven MSH6, two MLH1, one PMS2, and one MSH2). An explanation for the observed mismatch repair phenotype was available for 22/22 deficient cases, including 12 MLH1/PMS2 deficient (nine somatic methylation, one bi-allelic somatic deletion, and two pathogenic germline variant), one PMS2 deficient (one pathogenic germline variant), seven MSH6 deficient (seven pathogenic germline variant), and two MSH2/MSH6 deficient (one pathogenic germline variant and one bi-allelic somatic mutation). Concordance between clinical germline testing and panel sequencing results was 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of our custom next generation sequencing panel allowed for the streamlined assessment of hereditary and somatic causes of MMRd in ovarian cancers.

Keywords: Lynch Syndrome II; Ovarian Cancer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2023-004815