J Acad Nutr Diet. 2026 Mar 16. pii: S2212-2672(26)00046-8. [Epub ahead of print]
156331
Lisa J Harnack,
Niki Oldenburg,
Qi Wang,
Erika Helgeson,
Abdisa Taddese,
Nicole LaPage,
Alison Alvear,
Alison Wong,
Michelle Hanson,
Julie D Anderson,
Brad P Yentzer,
Douglas G Mashek,
Emily N C Manoogian,
Satchidananda Panda,
Lisa S Chow.
BACKGROUND: Time-restricted eating (TRE) may be as effective as an energy-restricted (ER) diet for weight loss. But little is known about the effects of TRE on eating patterns and dietary intake.
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to examine the relative effects of a TRE, ER, and unrestricted eating (UE) diet on eating patterns and dietary intake.
DESIGN: This study is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial carried out between October 2020 and October 2023. Over this period 88 participants were randomized to a TRE, ER or UE diet group.
PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Adults with obesity in the Minneapolis St Paul, Minnesota metropolitan area who completed study baseline and follow-up measures of dietary intake (n=73).
INTERVENTION: The interventions were: 1) TRE with an 8-hour self-chosen window with ad-libitum diet; 2) ER diet with 15% reduction of energy intake; or 3) unrestricted eating (UE) in which self-monitoring of food intake was encouraged with no specific change to eating recommended. The intervention period was 12 weeks.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes included meals eaten and intake of vegetables, fruit, dairy, protein foods, grains, energy, added sugars, saturated fat, sodium, dietary fiber and potassium.
STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Multivariate linear regression analyses were carried out to compare change in food and nutrient intake between experimental groups. Logistic mixed effects models were constructed to examine change in meals eaten.
RESULTS: The TRE group ate fewer daily meals at end-intervention (-1.1 meals/day; 95% CI: -1.6, -0.7) compared to baseline, whereas the ER and UE groups did not experience a change in eating occasions. Those in the TRE group were less likely to report eating breakfast during end-intervention compared to baseline (OR 0.13; 95% CI 0.05,0.33) whereas no statistically significant change in behavior was identified for the ER (OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.41,2.55) or UE (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.28,1.68) groups. Between baseline and end-intervention those in the TRE group had a decrease in intake of energy (-469 kcal/day; 95% CI: -681,-257), saturated fat (-8.5 g/day; 95% CI:-12.9,-4.1), potassium (-496 mg/day; 95% CI: -729,-263), and total (-1.7 ounce equivalents/day; 95% CI: -2.9,-0.6) and refined grains (-1.6 ounce equivalents; 95% CI: -2.6,-0.6). These changes were more marked compared to changes in the UE group. There were no statistically significant differences found between those in the TRE and ER groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that TRE with an 8-hour window and ad libitum intake may have similar effects on food and nutrient intake as an energy-restricted diet.
Keywords: Time-restricted eating; calorie-restricted diet; diet quality; eating pattern; randomized trial