bims-mesote Biomed News
on Mesothelioma
Issue of 2024–05–19
twelve papers selected by
Laura Mannarino, Humanitas Research



  1. Asian J Surg. 2024 May 10. pii: S1015-9584(24)00860-1. [Epub ahead of print]
      
    Keywords:  Diagnosis; Malignant pleural mesothelioma; Pathology; Sarcomatoid
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.04.176
  2. J Thorac Oncol. 2024 May 09. pii: S1556-0864(24)00208-9. [Epub ahead of print]
    Members of the Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee, Advisory Boards, and Participating Institutions
       INTRODUCTION: The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer developed an international database to inform potential revisions in the 9th edition of the Tumor, Node, Metastasis classification of diffuse pleural mesothelioma (PM). This study analyzed the clinical and pathological N categories to determine whether revisions were indicated relative to the 8th edition staging system.
    METHODS: Of 7,338 PM cases diagnosed 2013 to 2022, 3,598 met all inclusion criteria for planned analyses. Data on 2,836 patients without metastases were included in this study. Overall survival (OS) was measured from date of diagnosis. Patients were included regardless of whether they received neoadjuvant treatment. For the pathological N analysis, patients who underwent resection (extrapleural pneumonectomy or pleurectomy/decortication) were included. N subgroups were analyzed and overall survival (OS) assessed by the Kaplan Meier method.
    RESULTS: The existing 8th edition N categories performed adequately in the 9th edition dataset. A median OS advantage was noted for clinical and pathological N0 versus N1 patients: 23.2 versus 18.5 and 33.8 vs. 25.0 months, respectively. Patients with resected pN0 had a 3-year OS of 48%. No difference in OS was noted for single versus multiple station nodal metastases. The number of nodal stations sampled at the time of resection was not associated with a difference in OS.
    CONCLUSIONS: Data regarding clinical and pathological N categories corroborate those used in the 8th edition. No changes in the N categories are recommended in the 9th edition of PM staging system.
    Keywords:  Malignant pleural mesothelioma; TNM classification; staging
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2024.05.003
  3. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024 Apr 29. 13(4): 811-820
       Background: Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is an uncommon and extremely aggressive malignancy associated with past exposure to asbestos. The low representation of women among PM patients is likely due to differences in occupational asbestos exposure. Due to the controversial role of female sex as a prognostic factor in PM, the study aims to evaluate the survival of females treated with lung-sparing surgery. We present a cohort of 114 consecutive female patients with PM who underwent intended extended pleurectomy decortication (ePD) over 11 years in a high-volume single institution.
    Methods: All women from 2007-2017 who underwent intended ePD were enrolled in the study. Data on clinical, operative, and outcome were collected. Kaplan-Meier estimators and log-rank tests were employed to assess the overall survival, and Cox regression models were utilized to analyze prognostic factors.
    Results: During the study period, 454 patients underwent thoracotomy with intended ePD in a single institution. There were 114 females (25%), and macroscopic complete resection (MCR) was achieved in 97 (85.1%). The median age was 65 years, histology was epithelioid in 81 (71.0%), biphasic in 31 (27.2%), and sarcomatoid in 2 (1.8%). The 30- and 90-day mortality were 3.5% and 6.1%, respectively. Median survival in females was 38 months, and 5-year survival was 28.2%. The median survival and 5-year survival rate for patients with epithelioid histology and MCR were 44.4 months and 36.4%, respectively. In a univariate analysis, several factors were found to be associated with patient overall survival including MCR [hazard ratio (HR): 0.3, P<0.001], early T status (HR: 1.6, P=0.03), adjuvant therapy (HR: 0.5, P=0.006), intraoperative heated chemotherapy (IOHC) (HR: 0.8, P=0.03), age (HR: 1.02, P=0.03) and epithelioid histology (HR: 0.5, P=0.009).
    Conclusions: For women with epithelioid PM undergoing intended ePD within a multimodal setting, prolonged survival is anticipated.
    Keywords:  Pleural mesothelioma (PM); extended pleurectomy decortication (ePD); macroscopic complete resection (MCR); women
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-23-797
  4. J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 29. pii: 2600. [Epub ahead of print]13(9):
      Background/Objectives: Ultrasound (US) has been progressively spreading as the most useful technique for guiding biopsies and fine-needle aspirations that are performed percutaneously. Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) represents the most common malignant pleural tumour. Thoracoscopy represents the gold standard for diagnosis, although conditions hampering such diagnostic approach often coexist. The Objective was to determine whether ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle biopsy (US-PPNB) has a high diagnostic accuracy and represents a safe option for diagnosis of MPM. Methods: US-PPNB of pleural lesions suspected for MPM in patients admitted from January 2021 to June 2023 have been retrospectively analyzed. An 18-gauge semi-automatic spring-loaded biopsy system (Medax Velox 2®) was used by experienced pneumologists. The obtained specimens were histologically evaluated and defined as adequate or non-adequate for diagnosis according to whether the material was considered appropriate or not for immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis. The primary objective of the study was the diagnostic yield for a tissue diagnosis. Results: US-PPNB was diagnostic of MPM in 15 out of 18 patients (sensitivity: 83.39%; specificity: 100%; PPV: 100%). Three patients with non-adequate US-PPNB underwent thoracoscopy for diagnosis. We found significant differences in terms of mean pleural lesion thickness between patients with adequate and not-adequate biopsy (15.4 mm (SD: 9.19 mm) and 3.77 mm (SD: 0.60 mm), p < 0.0010. In addition, a significant positive correlation has been observed between diagnostic accuracy and FDG-PET avidity value. Conclusions: US-PPNB performed by a pneumologist represents a valid procedure with a high diagnostic yield and accuracy for the diagnosis of MPM, and may be considered as an alternative option in patients who are not suitable for thoracoscopy.
    Keywords:  biopsy; diagnosis; malignant pleural mesothelioma; ultrasound
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13092600
  5. Lancet Respir Med. 2024 May 10. pii: S2213-2600(24)00111-5. [Epub ahead of print]
      Most patients with pleural mesothelioma (PM) present with symptomatic pleural effusion. In some patients, PM is only detectable on the pleural surfaces, providing a strong rationale for intrapleural anticancer therapy. In modern prospective studies involving expert radiological staging and specialist multidisciplinary teams, the population incidence of stage I PM (an approximate surrogate of pleura-only PM) is higher than in historical retrospective series. In this Viewpoint, we advocate for the expansion of intrapleural trials to serve these patients, given the paucity of data supporting licensed systemic therapies in this setting and the uncertainties involved in surgical therapy. We begin by reviewing the unique anatomical and physiological features of the PM-bearing pleural space, before critically appraising the evidence for systemic therapies in stage I PM and previous intrapleural PM trials. We conclude with a summary of key challenges and potential solutions, including optimal trial designs, repurposing of indwelling pleural catheters, and new technologies.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00111-5
  6. J Thorac Oncol. 2024 May 09. pii: S1556-0864(24)00207-7. [Epub ahead of print]
    Members of the Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee, of the Advisory Boards and Participating Institutions
       INTRODUCTION: The eighth edition of the tumor, node and metastases (TNM) classification of pleural mesothelioma (PM) saw substantial changes in T and N components and stage groupings. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer collected data into a multinational database in order to further refine this classification. This 9th edition proposal incorporates changes proposed in the clinical (c)T component, but not the pathologic (p)T component, to include size criteria, and further refines TNM stage groupings for PM.
    METHODS: Data were submitted via electronic data capture (EDC) or batch transfer from institutional databases. Survival was measured from diagnosis date. Candidate stage groups were developed using a recursive partitioning and amalgamation (RPA) algorithm applied to all cM0 cases for clinical stage and subsequently for pathological stage. Cox models were developed to estimate survival for each stage group.
    RESULTS: Of 3598 submitted cases, 2192 were analyzable for overall cStage and 445 for overall pStage. RPA generated survival tree on OS outcomes restricted to cM0 with newly proposed (9th edition) cT and cN component-derived optimal stage groupings of: stage I (T1N0), II (T1N1; T2N0), IIIA (T1N2; T2N1/2; any T3), IIIB (any T4), and IV (any M1). Although cT and pT descriptors are different in the 9th edition, aligning pStage groupings with cStage produced better discrimination than retaining 8th edition pStage groupings.
    CONCLUSIONS: This revision of the clinical TNM classification for PM is the first to incorporate the measurement-based proposed changes in clinical T category. The pathological TNM aligns with clinical TNM.
    Keywords:  M component; Mesothelioma; N component; Pleural; Staging; T component
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2024.05.002
  7. Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 28. pii: 1719. [Epub ahead of print]16(9):
      Surgery plays a central role in the diagnosis, staging, and management of pleural mesothelioma. Achieving an accurate diagnosis through surgical intervention and identifying the specific histologic subtype is crucial for determining the appropriate course of treatment. The histologic subtype guides decisions regarding the use of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or multimodality treatment. The goal of surgery as part of multimodality treatment is to accomplish macroscopic complete resection with the eradication of grossly visible and palpable disease. Over the past two decades, many medical centers worldwide have shifted from performing extra-pleural pneumonectomy (EPP) to pleurectomy decortication (PD). This transition is motivated by the lower rates of short-term mortality and morbidity associated with PD and similar or even better long-term survival outcomes, compared to EPP. This review aims to outline the role of surgery in diagnosing, staging, and treating patients with pleural mesothelioma.
    Keywords:  extra-pleural pneumonectomy; macroscopic complete resection; pleural mesothelioma; pleurectomy decortication; surgery
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16091719
  8. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 May 15. 2024
      The current treatment for mesothelioma, in selected cases, consists of extended pleurodecortication and intrathoracic hyperthermic chemotherapy. This technique is laborious and detailed and must be followed step by step to achieve good results. We present the case of a patient with epithelioid mesothelioma meeting surgical criteria who underwent the mentioned technique, experiencing an adequate postoperative period and an early discharge. This experience demonstrates that the technique is safe when performed in centres with experience and the means to address this complex pathology.
    Keywords:  Decortication; HITHOC; Malignant pleural mesothelioma; Pleurectomy
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1510/mmcts.2024.007
  9. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024 Apr 29. 13(4): 733-748
       Background: The identification of prognostic biomarkers is crucial for guiding treatment strategies in mesothelioma patients. The Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) gene and its specific transcripts have been associated with patient survival in various tumours. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic potential of DMD gene expression and its transcripts in mesothelioma patients.
    Methods: We analysed The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) mesothelioma RNAseq, mutation, and clinical data to assess the association between DMD gene expression and its transcripts (Dp427, Dp71 splice variants) and mesothelioma survival. We also evaluated the specific Dp71 transcript as a unique prognostic biomarker across mesothelioma subtypes. Additionally, we performed differential gene expression analysis between high and low DMD gene/transcript expression groups.
    Results: The analysis included 57 epithelioid, 23 biphasic, two sarcomatoid, and five not otherwise specified (NOS) histological subtypes of mesothelioma samples. Univariate analysis revealed that high expression of the DMD gene and its Dp71 transcript was significantly associated with shorter survival in mesothelioma patients (P=0.003 and P<0.001, respectively). In a multivariate analysis, the association between Dp71 expression and survival remained significant [hazard ratio (HR) 2.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.24-4.23, P=0.008] across all mesothelioma patients, and also among patients with mesotheliomas without deep CDKN2A deletions (HR 3.58, 95% CI: 1.31-9.80, P=0.01). Pathway analysis revealed enrichment of cell cycle (P=3.01×10-4) and homologous recombination (P=0.01) pathways in differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between high and low Dp71 groups. Furthermore, there were correlations between Dp71 transcript expression and tumour microenvironment (TME) cells, including a weak positive correlation with macrophages (R=0.32, P=0.002) specifically M2 macrophages (R=0.34, P=0.001).
    Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the differential expression of specific DMD transcripts is associated with poor survival in mesothelioma patients. The specific Dp71 transcript can serve as a potential biomarker for predicting patient survival in diverse histological subtypes of mesothelioma. Further studies are needed to understand the role of specific dystrophin transcripts in cancer and TME cells, and their implications in the pathogenesis and progression of mesothelioma. Identifying patients at risk of poor survival based on DMD transcript expression can guide treatment strategies in mesothelioma, informing decisions regarding treatment intensity, follow-up schedules, eligibility for clinical trials, and ultimately, end-of-life care planning.
    Keywords:  Biomarker; Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene (DMD gene); mesothelioma; survival
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-24-28
  10. Lancet Respir Med. 2024 May 10. pii: S2213-2600(24)00119-X. [Epub ahead of print]
    MARS 2 Investigators
       BACKGROUND: Extended pleurectomy decortication for complete macroscopic resection for pleural mesothelioma has never been evaluated in a randomised trial. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes after extended pleurectomy decortication plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone.
    METHODS: MARS 2 was a phase 3, national, multicentre, open-label, parallel two-group, pragmatic, superiority randomised controlled trial conducted in the UK. The trial took place across 26 hospitals (21 recruiting only, one surgical only, and four recruiting and surgical). Following two cycles of chemotherapy, eligible participants with pleural mesothelioma were randomly assigned (1:1) to surgery and chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone using a secure web-based system. Individuals aged 16 years or older with resectable pleural mesothelioma and adequate organ and lung function were eligible for inclusion. Participants in the chemotherapy only group received two to four further cycles of chemotherapy, and participants in the surgery and chemotherapy group received pleurectomy decortication or extended pleurectomy decortication, followed by two to four further cycles of chemotherapy. It was not possible to mask allocation because the intervention was a major surgical procedure. The primary outcome was overall survival, defined as time from randomisation to death from any cause. Analyses were done on the intention-to-treat population for all outcomes, unless specified. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02040272, and is closed to new participants.
    FINDINGS: Between June 19, 2015, and Jan 21, 2021, of 1030 assessed for eligibility, 335 participants were randomly assigned (169 to surgery and chemotherapy, and 166 to chemotherapy alone). 291 (87%) participants were men and 44 (13%) women, and 288 (86%) were diagnosed with epithelioid mesothelioma. At a median follow-up of 22·4 months (IQR 11·3-30·8), median survival was shorter in the surgery and chemotherapy group (19·3 months [IQR 10·0-33·7]) than in the chemotherapy alone group (24·8 months [IQR 12·6-37·4]), and the difference in restricted mean survival time at 2 years was -1·9 months (95% CI -3·4 to -0·3, p=0·019). There were 318 serious adverse events (grade ≥3) in the surgery group and 169 in the chemotherapy group (incidence rate ratio 3·6 [95% CI 2·3 to 5·5], p<0·0001), with increased incidence of cardiac (30 vs 12; 3·01 [1·13 to 8·02]) and respiratory (84 vs 34; 2·62 [1·58 to 4·33]) disorders, infection (124 vs 53; 2·13 [1·36 to 3·33]), and additional surgical or medical procedures (15 vs eight; 2·41 [1·04 to 5·57]) in the surgery group.
    INTERPRETATION: Extended pleurectomy decortication was associated with worse survival to 2 years, and more serious adverse events for individuals with resectable pleural mesothelioma, compared with chemotherapy alone.
    FUNDING: National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (15/188/31), Cancer Research UK Feasibility Studies Project Grant (A15895).
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00119-X
  11. BMJ Open. 2024 May 16. 14(5): e079108
       OBJECTIVES: Recruiting to randomised trials is often challenging particularly when the intervention arms are markedly different. The Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery 2 randomised controlled trial (RCT) compared standard chemotherapy with or without (extended) pleurectomy decortication surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Anticipating recruitment difficulties, a QuinteT Recruitment Intervention was embedded in the main trial phase to unearth and address barriers. The trial achieved recruitment to target with a 4-month COVID-19 pandemic-related extension. This paper presents the key recruitment challenges, and the strategies delivered to optimise recruitment and informed consent.
    DESIGN: A multifaceted, flexible, mixed-method approach to investigate recruitment obstacles drawing on data from staff/patient interviews, audio recorded study recruitment consultations and screening logs. Key findings were translated into strategies targeting identified issues. Data collection, analysis, feedback and strategy implementation continued cyclically throughout the recruitment period.
    SETTING: Secondary thoracic cancer care.
    RESULTS: Respiratory physicians, oncologists, surgeons and nursing specialists supported the trial, but recruitment challenges were evident. The study had to fit within a framework of a thoracic cancer service considered overstretched where patients encountered multiple healthcare professionals and treatment views, all of which challenged recruitment. Clinician treatment biases, shaped in part by the wider clinical and research context alongside experience, adversely impacted several aspects of the recruitment process by restricting referrals for study consideration, impacting eligibility decisions, affecting the neutrality in which the study and treatment was presented and shaping patient treatment expectations and preferences. Individual and group recruiter feedback and training raised awareness of key equipoise issues, offered support and shared good practice to safeguard informed consent and optimise recruitment.
    CONCLUSIONS: With bespoke support to overcome identified issues, recruitment to a challenging RCT of surgery versus no surgery in a thoracic cancer setting with a complex recruitment pathway and multiple health professional involvement is possible.
    TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN ISRCTN44351742, Clinical Trials.gov NCT02040272.
    Keywords:  Clinical Trial; ONCOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; Randomized Controlled Trial; Thoracic surgery
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079108