bims-mesote 2024-09-29 papers

Issue of 2024‒09‒29
four papers selected by
Laura Mannarino, Humanitas Research

Updates Surg. 2024 Sep 21.

Effect of intraoperative hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy after pleurectomy decortication for treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma: a comparative study.

Hany Hasan Elsayed, Hazem Youssef Sharkawy, Mohammed Attia Ahmed, Mohammed Abdel-Gayed, Mostafa Eldewer.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive malignancy with few long-term survivors. Despite the dismal prognosis, hyperthermic intrathoracic chemoperfusion (HITOC) was shown to improve survival in a selective group of patients. We analyzed the influence of HITOC following pleurectomy and decortication on postoperative morbidity and overall survival for patients suffering from localized mesothelioma. From March 2017 until August 2023, 55 patients with localized pleural mesothelioma underwent pleurectomy and decortication. Thirty patients performed only surgery while 25 consecutive patients had surgery followed by HITOC with cisplatin (125 mg/m2) infused for 70 min at a temp of 40-43 °C. We analyzed postoperative morbidity, HITOC-related complications, and the influence of HITOC on survival. The trial was registered on 19/08/2022 as NCT05508555. The HITOC group had a mean age of 53.1 ± 8.2 years while the surgery group (non-HITOC) had a mean age of 52.1 ± 8.6 years. The HITOC group had 17 (68%) men, whereas the surgery group included 18 (60%) males. The 30-day mortality in the HITOC group was 0% vs 1 case (3.3%) in the surgery group. HITOC-related transient complications occurred in 4/25 (16%) of the HITOC group (atrial fibrillation, renal impairment and transient hypotension). Progression-free survival in the HITOC group was 8 months (95% CI 4.3-11.6) vs 6 months (95% CI 2.5-9.9) in the surgery-only group (p = 0.79). The overall survival time in the HITOC group was 28 months (95% CI 21.5-34.5) vs 22 months (95% CI 17.5-26.5) in the surgery-only group (p = 0.75). Risk factors analysis for recurrence in the HITOC group confirmed a significant role for early stages (p = 0.03). HITOC following pleurectomy and decortication is a safe therapeutic option that may improve survival for selected patients with localized epithelial pleural mesothelioma. Patients with earlier-stage mesothelioma are more likely to benefit from radical surgery and HITOC.

Keywords: Chemotherapy; HITOC; Mesothelioma; Survival

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-01986-1

World J Exp Med. 2024 Sep 20. 14(3): 91739

Malignant pleural mesothelioma: The disdained member of thoracic oncology!

Divya Khosla, Pawan Kumar Singh, Bharath A Chhabria, Vaishali Kataria, Navneet Singh, Rakesh Kapoor.

Pleural mesothelioma is a very aggressive malignancy that arises from the pleural mesothelial cell lining and is linked strongly to prior asbestos exposure. The ban on asbestos has helped to lower the incidence, but in developing countries like India, it is expected to rise. It has an extended latency period usually progressing over decades and presents with nonspecific symptoms. It has a median survival ranging between 10-22 months. The diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma is challenging and is done using computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, or positron emission tomography-CT, with the last two predicting the resectability of the tumor better than CT alone. A pleural biopsy along with an array of immunohistochemical markers, such as p16, BRCA1 associated protein 1, and claudin-4, are required for a definitive diagnosis. Several genetic alterations have prognostic significance as well. The current histological subtype identification is indispensable for decision making because of the new therapeutic avenues being explored. The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab-based immunotherapy outperformed platinum and pemetrexed-based chemotherapy in terms of survival benefit and improved quality of life especially for non-epithelioid subtypes. However, the latter continues to be a robust treatment option for patients with the epithelioid subtype. Surgery is recommended for resectable cases with radiotherapy being indicated in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and palliative settings along with systemic treatment. This review article provides an overview of epidemiology, etiology, clinical manifestations, diagnostic approaches (including immunohistochemical and genetic markers), staging, and multidisciplinary approaches to current treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma using surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy. It also sheds light on some recent studies (EMPHACIS, CALGB30901, Checkmate-743, etc.) that have led to significant developments in recent years with clinically meaningful results.

Keywords: Chemotherapy; Diagnosis; Immunotherapy; Malignant pleural mesothelioma; Radiotherapy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v14.i3.91739

Curr Oncol. 2024 Aug 27. 31(9): 4968-4983

Diagnosis of Pleural Mesothelioma: Is Everything Solved at the Present Time?

Elisa Roca, Avinash Aujayeb, Philippe Astoul.

Ranked high in worldwide growing health issues, pleural diseases affect approximately one million people globally per year and are often correlated with a poor prognosis. Among these pleural diseases, malignant pleural mesothelioma (PM), a neoplastic disease mainly due to asbestos exposure, still remains a diagnostic challenge. Timely diagnosis is imperative to define the most suitable therapeutic approach for the patient, but the choice of diagnostic modalities depends on operator experience and local facilities while bearing in mind the yield of each diagnostic procedure. Since the analysis of pleural fluid cytology is not sufficient in differentiating historical features in PM, histopathological and morphological features obtained via tissue biopsies are fundamental. The quality of biopsy samples is crucial and often requires highly qualified expertise. Since adequate tissue biopsy is essential, medical or video-assisted thoracoscopy (MT or VATS) is proposed as the most suitable approach, with the former being a physician-led procedure. Indeed, MT is the diagnostic gold standard for malignant pleural pathologies. Moreover, this medical or surgical approach can allow diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: it provides the possibility of video-assisted biopsies, the drainage of high volumes of pleural fluid and the administration of sterile calibrated talcum powder under visual control in order to achieve pleurodesis, placement of indwelling pleural catheters if required and in a near future potential intrapleural therapy. In this context, dedicated diagnostic pathways remain a crucial need, especially to quickly and properly diagnose PM. Lastly, the interdisciplinary approach and multidisciplinary collaboration should always be implemented in order to direct the patient to the best customised diagnostic and therapeutic pathway. At the present time, the diagnosis of PM remains an unsolved problem despite MDT (multidisciplinary team) meetings, mainly because of the lack of standardised diagnostic work-up. This review aims to provide an overview of diagnostic procedures in order to propose a clear strategy.

Keywords: asbestos; mesothelioma; pleural imaging; pleuroscopy; thoracentesis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31090368