bims-micesi Biomed News
on Mitotic cell signalling
Issue of 2022‒01‒30
ten papers selected by
Valentina Piano
Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology


  1. Cell Rep. 2022 Jan 25. pii: S2211-1247(22)00017-1. [Epub ahead of print]38(4): 110305
      During cell division, dramatic microtubular rearrangements driven by cyclin B-cdk1 (Cdk1) kinase activity mark the onset of mitosis leading to dismantling of the interphase microtubular cytoskeleton and assembly of the mitotic spindle. During interphase, Cdk1 accumulates in an inactive state, phosphorylated at inhibitory sites by Wee1/Myt1 kinases. At mitosis onset, Cdc25 phosphatase dephosphorylates and activates Cdk1. Once activated, Cdk1 clears cytoplasmic microtubules by inhibiting microtubule-stabilizing and growth-promoting microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs). Nevertheless, some of these MAPs are required for spindle microtubule growth and spindle assembly, creating quite a conundrum. We show here that a Cdk1 fraction bound to spindle structures escapes Cdc25 action and remains inhibited by phosphorylation (i-Cdk1) in mitotic human cells. Loss or restoration of i-Cdk1 inhibits or promotes spindle assembly, respectively. Furthermore, polymerizing spindle microtubules foster i-Cdk1 aggregating with Wee1 and excluding Cdc25. Our data reveal that spindle assembly relies on compartmentalized control of Cdk1 activity.
    Keywords:  Cdk1; MAP; Wee1; cell cycle; compartmentalization; i-Cdk1; microtubule-associated proteins; mitotic spindle assembly; spindle assembly checkpoint
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110305
  2. J Cell Sci. 2022 Jan 15. pii: jcs259395. [Epub ahead of print]135(2):
      Centrosomes are the main microtubule-organizing centres, playing essential roles in the organization of the cytoskeleton during interphase, and in the mitotic spindle, which controls chromosome segregation, during cell division. Centrosomes also act as the basal body of cilia, regulating cilium length and affecting extracellular signal reception as well as the integration of intracellular signalling pathways. Centrosomes are self-replicative and duplicate once every cell cycle to generate two centrosomes. The core support structure of the centrosome consists of two molecularly distinct centrioles. The mother (mature) centriole exhibits accessory appendages and is surrounded by both pericentriolar material and centriolar satellites, structures that the daughter (immature) centriole lacks. In this Review, we discuss what is currently known about centrosome duplication, its dialogue with the cell cycle and the sequential acquisition of specific components during centriole maturation. We also describe our current understanding of the mature centriolar structures that are required to build a cilium. Altogether, the built-in centrosome asymmetries that stem from the two centrosomes inheriting molecularly different centrioles sets the foundation for cell division being an intrinsically asymmetric process.
    Keywords:  Cell division; Centrosome asymmetries; Centrosome maturation; Primary cilium
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.259395
  3. Mol Biol Cell. 2022 Feb 01. 33(2): rt1
      Formation of a bipolar spindle is required for the faithful segregation of chromosomes during cell division. Twenty-five years ago, a transformative insight into how bipolarity is achieved was provided by Rebecca Heald, Eric Karsenti, and colleagues in their landmark publication characterizing a chromatin-mediated spindle assembly pathway in which centrosomes and kinetochores were dispensable. The discovery revealed that bipolar spindle assembly is a self-organizing process where microtubules, which possess an intrinsic polarity, polymerize around chromatin and become sorted by mitotic motors into a bipolar structure. On the 25th anniversary of this seminal paper, we discuss what was known before, what we have learned since, and what may lie ahead in understanding the bipolar spindle.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E21-08-0400
  4. J Biol Chem. 2022 Jan 24. pii: S0021-9258(22)00072-2. [Epub ahead of print] 101632
      Both the DNA damage response (DDR) and the mitotic checkpoint are critical for the maintenance of genomic stability. Among proteins involved in these processes, the Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) kinase is required for both activation of the DDR and the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC). In mitosis without DNA damage, the enzymatic activity of ATM is enhanced; however, substrates of ATM in mitosis are unknown. Using Stable Isotope Labeled Amino Acid in cell culture (SILAC)-mass spectrometry analysis, we identified a number of proteins that can potentially be phosphorylated by ATM during mitosis. This list is highly enriched in proteins involved in cell cycle regulation and the DDR. Among them, we further validated that ATM phosphorylated Budding Uninhibited by Benzimidazoles 3 (Bub3), a major component of the SAC, on serine 135 both in vitro and in vivo. During mitosis, this phosphorylation promoted activation of another SAC component, Bub1. Mutation of Bub3 serine 135 to alanine led to a defect in SAC activation. Furthermore, we found that ATM-mediated phosphorylation of Bub3 on serine 135 was also induced by ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage. However, this event resulted in independent signaling involving interaction with the Ku70-Ku80-DNA-PKcs sensor/kinase complex, leading to efficient non-homologous end joining repair. Taken together, we highlight the functional significance of the crosstalk between the kinetochore-oriented signal and double strand break repair pathways via ATM phosphorylation of Bub3 on serine 135.
    Keywords:  ATM; Bub3; DNA damage response; Mitosis; phosphorylation
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101632
  5. PLoS Pathog. 2022 Jan;18(1): e1010223
      Transmission of malaria-causing parasites to mosquitoes relies on the production of gametocyte stages and their development into gametes. These stages display various microtubule cytoskeletons and the architecture of the corresponding microtubule organisation centres (MTOC) remains elusive. Combining ultrastructure expansion microscopy (U-ExM) with bulk proteome labelling, we first reconstructed in 3D the subpellicular microtubule network which confers cell rigidity to Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes. Upon activation, as the microgametocyte undergoes three rounds of endomitosis, it also assembles axonemes to form eight flagellated microgametes. U-ExM combined with Pan-ExM further revealed the molecular architecture of the bipartite MTOC coordinating mitosis with axoneme formation. This MTOC spans the nuclear membrane linking cytoplasmic basal bodies to intranuclear bodies by proteinaceous filaments. In P. berghei, the eight basal bodies are concomitantly de novo assembled in a SAS6- and SAS4-dependent manner from a deuterosome-like structure, where centrin, γ-tubulin, SAS4 and SAS6 form distinct subdomains. Basal bodies display a fusion of the proximal and central cores where centrin and SAS6 are surrounded by a SAS4-toroid in the lumen of the microtubule wall. Sequential nucleation of axonemes and mitotic spindles is associated with a dynamic movement of γ-tubulin from the basal bodies to the intranuclear bodies. This dynamic architecture relies on two non-canonical regulators, the calcium-dependent protein kinase 4 and the serine/arginine-protein kinase 1. Altogether, these results provide insights into the molecular organisation of a bipartite MTOC that may reflect a functional transition of a basal body to coordinate axoneme assembly with mitosis.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1010223
  6. Biol Reprod. 2022 Jan 27. pii: ioac011. [Epub ahead of print]
      Oocyte aneuploidy is caused mainly by chromosome nondisjunction and/or unbalanced sister chromatid pre-division. Although studies in somatic cells have shown that topoisomerase II (TOP2) plays important roles in chromosome condensation and timely separation of centromeres, little is known about its role during oocyte meiosis. Furthermore, because VP-16, which is a TOP2 inhibitor and induces DNA double strand breaks, is often used for ovarian cancer chemotherapy, its effects on oocytes must be studied for ovarian cancer patients to recover ovarian function following chemotherapy. This study showed that inhibiting TOP2 with either ICRF-193 or VP-16 during meiosis I impaired chromatin condensation, chromosome alignment, TOP2α localization and caused metaphase I (MI) arrest and first polar body (PB1) abscission failure. Inhibiting or neutralizing either spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), Aurora B or maturation-promoting factor (MPF) significantly abolished the effect of ICRF-193 or VP-16 on MI arrest. Treatment with ICRF-193 or VP-16 significantly activated MPF and SAC but the effect disappeared when Aurora B was inhibited. Most of the oocytes matured in the presence of ICRF-193 or VP-16 were arrested at MI, and only 11% to 27% showed PB1 protrusion. Furthermore, most of the PB1 protrusions formed in the presence of ICRF-193 or VP-16 were retracted after further culture for 7 h. In conclusion, TOP2 dysfunction causes MI arrest by activating Aurora B, SAC and MPF and it prevents PB1 abscission by promoting chromatin bridges.
    Keywords:  Aurora B; meiosis; oocyte maturation; spindle assembly checkpoint; topoisomerase II
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioac011
  7. Lab Chip. 2022 Jan 20.
      Cell cycle synchronisation is the process of isolating cell populations at specific phases of the cell cycle from heterogeneous, asynchronous cell cultures. The process has important implications in targeted gene-editing and drug efficacy of cells and in studying cell cycle events and regulatory mechanisms involved in the cell cycle progression of multiple cell species. Ideally, cell cycle synchrony techniques should be applicable for all cell types, maintain synchrony across multiple cell cycle events, maintain cell viability and be robust against metabolic and physiological perturbations. In this review, we categorize cell cycle synchronisation approaches and discuss their operational principles and performance efficiencies. We highlight the advances and technological development trends from conventional methods to the more recent microfluidics-based systems. Furthermore, we discuss the opportunities and challenges for implementing high throughput cell synchronisation and provide future perspectives on synchronisation platforms, specifically hybrid cell synchrony modalities, to allow the highest level of phase-specific synchrony possible with minimal alterations in diverse types of cell cultures.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1039/D1LC00724F
  8. Hum Cell. 2022 Jan 28.
      Aurora kinase B (AURKB) is a type of functional kinase with primary functions of participating in cell mitosis, which has been identified to be involved in the occurrence and development of malignant tumors strongly. However, it still remains a controversial with respect to the relationship between the phosphorylation level of AURKB and its function. In our initial research, there was no significant difference in the relative content of AURKB protein between drug-resistant breast cancer cells and wild-type cells; however, its phosphorylation level in drug-resistant cells was significantly higher than that in wild-type cells. Subsequent cell and animal experiments both confirmed the positive correlation between AURKB phosphorylation and drug resistance. Furthermore, PRKCE in the upstream was identified to regulate the phosphorylation of AURKB, which promoted the change of spatial localization of AURKB from nucleus to cytoplasm. Accordingly, phosphorylated AURKB reduced the negative regulation of downstream RAB27B transcription physically, and interacted with RAB27B in cytoplasm to maintain its protein stability. Eventually, it promoted exosome secretion of drug-resistant cells and drug efflux. Using shRNA to knockdown AURKB expression, using hesperadin to inhibit AURKB activity, mutating the AURKB phosphorylation site, or using siRNA as well as BIM to inhibit the activity of the upstream AURKB phosphorylation regulatory protein PRKCE, all of which directly or indirectly reduce AURKB phosphorylation, are effective in reversing PTX resistance in cells. Collectively, this study provides experimental evidence for PRKCE/AURKB/RAB27B axis in regulating the resistance to paclitaxel (PTX) in breast cancer cells, offering a potential intervention target for reversing drug resistance.
    Keywords:  AURKB; Breast cancer; Drug resistance; Paclitaxel; Phosphorylation
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13577-022-00675-8
  9. Bioengineered. 2022 Feb;13(2): 2471-2485
      Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is one of the most common causes of cancer death in men. BUB1B (BUB1 mitotic checkpoint serine/threonine kinase B) has been reported to contribute to the initiation and development of several cancers. Here, we aimed to explore the potential role of BUB1B in LUAD. We found BUB1B was upregulated in LUAD, suggesting its potential role as a biomarker for LUAD diagnosis. Significantly, LUAD patients with high BUB1B expression had a shorter survival time than those with low BUB1B expression. Knocking-out BUB1B resulted in suppression of cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro, and inhibition of tumor growth in the xenograft experiment. Further analysis revealed that BUB1B regulates glycolysis in LUAD and interacting with ZNF143 in LUAD cells. The interaction was demonstrated by silencing ZNF143, which led to a decrease in proliferation, migration, and invasion in LUAD cells, whereas overexpressing BUB1B had the opposite effects. Our study suggested that the ZNF143/BUB1B axis plays a pivotal role in LUAD progression, which might be a potential target for LUAD management.
    Keywords:  BUB1B; ZNF143; glycolysis; lung adenocarcinoma; transcriptional activator
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2021.2013108
  10. Ann Transl Med. 2021 Dec;9(23): 1744
      Background: Centromere protein U (CENP-U) is a component of the kinetochore and can regulate the cell cycle as a receptor of polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1). Recent studies have partially identified the role of CENP-U in tumor progression, but the underlying mechanisms of CENP-U in tumor immunity remain obscure.Methods: We performed pan-cancer analysis to evaluate the role of CENP-U in immunity and proliferation with data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) datasets, and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Results of CENP-U expression and related clinicopathological data were obtained to show the expression levels, prognosis, tumor progression, immune neoantigens, and immune checkpoints of CENP-U in 33 tumors. The Tumor Immune Estimation Resource (TIMER) dataset was used to analyze immune infiltration scores.
    Results: Results of the pan-cancer analysis demonstrated that CENP-U is differentially expressed in normal tissues and common tumor tissues. Moreover, differentially expressed CENP-U was also identified between matched normal and tumor tissues, and the high expression level of CENP-U was associated with poor prognosis for 33 kinds of tumor except for that of thymoma (THYM) and lymphoid neoplasm diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBC). Furthermore, the correlation between CENP-U expression and immune checkpoints and immune neoantigens was determined. In addition, CENP-U expression was correlated with tumor-infiltrating immune cells especially in THYM but not in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), esophageal carcinoma (ESCA), or lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Finally, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) indicated that CENP-U is critically involved in tumor proliferation, immunity, and metabolism.
    Conclusions: CENP-U, a mitosis-related kinase, was found to be differentially expressed across different cancer types and to play an important role in tumor progression and immunity. CENP-U holds the potential to be a prognostic marker, whose targeting may provide therapeutic benefit.
    Keywords:  Centromere protein U (CENP-U); immunity; mitosis; pan-cancer analysis
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6516