J Urol. 2023 Jul 11. 101097JU0000000000003618
PURPOSE: We assessed the prognostic significance of quantification of perineural invasion (PNI) on prostate biopsy (PBx).MATERIALS AND METHODS: We quantified actual PNI foci in the entire PBx specimens from 724 patients and compared corresponding radical prostatectomy (RP) findings and long-term oncologic outcomes.
RESULTS: No PNI was detected in 524 (72.4%) PBxs, whereas 1 (≥129; 17.8%), 2 (n=40; 5.5%), 3 (n=18; 2.5%), 4 (n=7; 1.0%), and 5-10 (n=6; 0.8%) PNI foci were present in other cases. We confirmed a higher risk of recurrence after RP in patients with PNI on PBx than in those with no PNI (P < .001). Remarkably, recurrence-free survival was comparable between those with 0 vs 1 PNI (P = .9) or 2 vs ≥3 PNIs (P = .3). Nonetheless, multifocal PNI per PBx (vs single PNI; P < .001) and >1 PNI per 10-mm tumor (vs ≤1 PNI; P = .008) were associated with worse outcomes. Interestingly, in a subgroup outcome analysis of single vs multifocal PNI per PBx, there was a significant difference in patients showing PNI involving only 1 of sextant sites. In multivariable analysis, both multifocal PNI/case (HR=5.48, P < .001) and >1 PNI/10-mm tumor (HR=3.96, P < .001) showed significance for recurrence. Meanwhile, compared with CAPRA score alone (0.687/0.685), Harrell's c-index/AUC for predicting 5-year recurrence-free survival were gradually increased when 1 (0.722/0.740), 2 (0.747/0.773), or 3 (0.760/0.792) point(s) were additionally assigned to multifocal PNI.
CONCLUSIONS: Multifocal PNI and >1 PNI per 10-mm tumor on each PBx were thus found to be associated with poorer prognosis, as independent predictors, in men with prostate cancer undergoing RP.
Keywords: needle biopsy; perineural invasion; prognosis; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy