bims-tyki2d Biomed News
on Thymidine kinase 2 deficiency
Issue of 2026–09–27
two papers selected by
Zoya Panahloo, UCB



  1. Children (Basel). 2026 Sep 04. pii: 1194. [Epub ahead of print]13(9):
       BACKGROUND: Rare diseases collectively affect millions of children worldwide and are a major cause of pediatric morbidity, mortality, and lifelong disability. Although most have a genetic basis, obtaining a timely molecular diagnosis remains challenging because of substantial clinical and genetic heterogeneity. Advances in genomic medicine are transforming rare disease diagnosis and establishing genomics as the center of precision medicine.
    METHODS: This review summarizes current evidence on genomic approaches for pediatric rare diseases, including established and emerging sequencing technologies, their clinical applications, implementation challenges, and future directions.
    RESULTS: Whole-genome sequencing is increasingly being adopted as a first-line genomic test for suspected rare genetic disorders, particularly when the phenotype is heterogeneous or does not point to a specific diagnosis. Conventional cytogenetic and targeted molecular techniques remain important complementary approaches for selected phenotypes, variant classes, and orthogonal confirmation. Gene panels are effective for well-defined phenotypes, whereas whole-exome sequencing remains a high-yield approach for genetically heterogeneous disorders, particularly when whole-genome sequencing is not available or is not clinically indicated. Long-read whole-genome sequencing expands diagnostic capacity by detecting structural variants, repeat expansions, complex rearrangements, and non-coding pathogenic variants that frequently escape short-read technologies. Emerging multi-omics approaches further improve variant interpretation and help resolve previously unsolved cases. Beyond diagnosis, molecular findings guide personalized clinical management, genetic counselling, reproductive planning, and access to targeted therapies and genotype-driven clinical trials. However, broad implementation is constrained by challenges in variant interpretation, ethical and legal considerations, data governance, workforce capacity, cost, and inequitable access to genomic services. Artificial intelligence, international data-sharing initiatives, and coordinated healthcare networks are helping overcome these barriers and improve diagnostic equity.
    CONCLUSIONS: Whole-genome sequencing is increasingly emerging as a first-line genomic strategy for pediatric rare diseases, while complementary technologies, expert phenotyping, and iterative data interpretation remain essential for comprehensive and accurate diagnosis and equitable access to genomic medicine.
    Keywords:  genome sequencing; genomic medicine; molecular diagnosis; precision medicine; rare diseases
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3390/children13091194
  2. Am J Hum Genet. 2026 Sep 21. pii: S0002-9297(26)00343-5. [Epub ahead of print]
      Genomic sequencing has the potential to transform newborn screening (NBS) for rare diseases but raises significant pragmatic, clinical, psychosocial, ethical, and policy issues. Evidence is urgently needed to guide policy as healthcare systems around the world contemplate implementation. In 2025, four major genomic NBS (gNBS) studies, totaling over 10,800 newborns from the US, Belgium, and Australia, published initial results. The adoption of different approaches to key implementation issues in diverse healthcare systems by these studies allows us to draw comparisons and enable collective learning. All studies reported successful use of dried blood spots for DNA extraction, which supports integration with existing NBS infrastructure. Experience with automation of genomic data analysis and reporting was variable, with valuable insights gained about balancing sensitivity, specificity, scalability, and resource utilization going forward. The screen-positive rate ranged from 1.6% to 3.7%, with G6PD deficiency by far the most common condition identified. Further comparison of results was limited by wide variation in the number and type of conditions included and by inconsistencies in how outcomes were defined and reported, highlighting the need for greater harmonization of study designs and data collection. The ability to deliver gNBS at the scale and pace that would be required for a public screening program remains untested, and data on long-term outcomes and costs are still needed. Concerns also remain about inequitable access and outcomes, particularly for families at socioeconomic, linguistic, and geographical disadvantage, and these key questions need to be addressed next as the field continues to evolve.
    Keywords:  feasibility; genomics; newborn screening
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2026.09.002